Pages: 1 |
| Has there actually been that much change in shoe technology? (Read 285 times) |
bjoiner view log |
posted: 3/18/2008 at 7:50 PM |
Ok, I can see that shoes today are much better than they were back in the day, but is there really that much improvement from generation to generation? My last 7-8 pairs of Asics pretty much felt the same, although getting the "latest and greatest" shoe runs you about 40 dollars extra.
So what is the latest (non-gimmicky) advance in the state of the art? |
|
|
|
| view log |
posted: 3/19/2008 at 9:16 PM |
Quote from modal on 3/18/2008 at 7:53 PM:
Heelys - ack ack ack!! Annoying and dangerous. I haven't seen as many around lately. Maybe all the little buggers had accidents on them. |
| Maine Coast HM, September 21 |
|
|
VictorN |
posted: 3/20/2008 at 7:56 PM |
| Quote from bjoiner on 3/18/2008 at 7:50 PM: I can see that shoes today are much better than they were back in the day
I'm not convinced that is true. Marketing is better, but I don't think shoes are better. My favorites always end up being simple, light-weight flats, or no-nonsense gimmick free shoes from the less popular brands.
My favorite pair is still an old pair of Asics Racers, from the 80's.
Victor
|
|
|
| view log Can we play now? |
posted: 3/22/2008 at 2:28 AM |
The best, and longest-lasting running shoes I've ever owned were Nike Air Pegasus, 1988.
Seems shoes have gotten lighter, which is nice, but not necessarily better. Just my $.02. |
|
|
Pages: 1 |
