Forums > Racing > Goal of sub 18:36 minute(6 minute mile average) and sub 18:00 5k
PRs: 5K--18:11 (June 2009), 8K--30:02 (March 2011), 10K--38:38 (April 2009), 10 Mile--1:01:59 (May 2011), HM--1:23:16 (March 2010), MAR--3:04:14 (April 2010)
Interesting that both Rodeido and dcv are using marathon training to improve 5K race. I'm gonaa try the opposite. I've only marathon trained for years. No intervals or Vo2max or the like. So, my feeling is that I've got a great base of endurance but little speed. Ever see the Daniel's training pyramid? I'm feeling like I've never moved beyond the Tempo point in the pyramid and my times bear that out. My short distance race times don't approach what the calculators predict based on my longer distance race times. Hence a shift in quality day focus to Vo2max. Anyone have any comments?
Ken - my last marathon training cycle was the first where i did anything above daniels' tempo point too. prior to that i was nursing achilles issues and the fast stuff tore it up. so i focused on running a lot of miles (100+) - result was a 3:06 and i finished feeling great, with energy to spare. recovery was pretty much instantaneous.
this time i was coming back from another injury and knew i didnt have the time to build the mileage and get thru on endurance, so i went with a lower mileage (peaked at 70) plan with a lot more speedwork (800s, 1200s). the result was a 3:03 but i was trashed at the end and it's taken me 2 weeks to get over it. the positive side effect of this cycle was that my 5k, 10k and half times all came down significantly.
now it could be that cycle B was better simply because it followed cycle A, so it's hard to say whether it was better or not, but i have to figure that if all other things are equal, being able to run a 5k at 6:00 (vs 6:15) pace, has to make running a marathon at 6:52 pace that much easier.
Next (cycle C) will be a combination of both (high mileage and a fair amount speedwork) which will hopefully be enough to get me a 2-something in chicago.
Alan - thanks for that detailed response, very helpful. I guess cycle C is the Holy Grail, eh? I'll probably end up giving up on my 3000mile goal for the year (which was pretty much out the window when I got injured in Jan) and try to keep mileage in the 60-80mpw range from now till Fall marathon season. For the next several weeks I'll try to fold in the VO2Max workouts instead of so many tempo-type runs. I also believe that 6:40 tempo intervals or tempo runs were too slow for me to get maximal benefit. I think they should have been run at 6:30.
As my primary focus is on marathon performance, my answers will differ, but here it goes:
Same for me. I'm fully aware that my training is not optimized for 5k .....
John
More Cowbell!
I just found that running 200's, 400's and 800's at 5:20 pace trashed my legs for at least 2 days afterwards.
I've gotten into a bad habit of breaking out VDOT tables lately, but they can be instructive. Using your recent 38:49 10k PR, you get:
20th Century: Is ancient history 21st Century: 5k: 19:42 |10k: 43:00
Understatement. It only takes 5:46 per mile to run a 17:55.
Alan, I think you might do well to slow things down a bit too. It seems that you went from one extreme to another in your 2 training cycles. The sweet spot is probably somewhere in between.
And buddy Ken; I agree that 6:40 pace is a bit slow for you as a pure tempo run. However, when you tack on those hill charges and/or 200's at the end it makes all the difference. Even 6:45 would provide plenty of benefit when done as lead up to even a small volume of something quicker.
I was running R-paced stuff. So its the next layer down.... I went off of a 54 VDOT which said 1:21 for 400m, 40 sec for 200m and 2:45 for 800m. I was right around there for those +/- a second... Something like 10x400m R with 400m jog in between each... The interval stuff would be something like 4-5x1000m with 500m J in between each with the 1000's in 3:41 which I did one day...
I've got that website on my bookmarks... My marathon time, 4 mile time and 10k time are all around VDOT 54.
I've gotten into a bad habit of breaking out VDOT tables lately, but they can be instructive. Using your recent 38:49 10k PR, you get: Type mile 1600m 1200m 1000m 800m 400m 200m Easy/Long E/L 8:03 8:00 5:00 2:00 Marathon M 6:50 6:48 4:15 1:42 Threshold T 6:27 6:25 4:01 1:36 Interval I 5:56 5:54 4:26 3:41 2:57 1:29 Rep R 2:45 1:22 40 Looks to me like you were doing your interval work too hard. Running above 100% VO2max doesn't get you any further aerobic benefit compared to running at 100%, and it trashes your legs, as you said.
Ken, For full recovery 200s and 400s and 1-2 800s, you should be down by mile pace, not 5k pace. Your rest for these should be greater than the time it took to do the interval. Basically, jog the same distance of the interval. For 5k pace stuff, its more like 5x800m @ 5k with 400m jog rest. The recovery should be about 50-90% of the time of the interval. For the 200s, 400s, the rest should be like 180% of the interval...
Alan - thanks for that detailed response, very helpful. I guess cycle C is the Holy Grail, eh? I'll probably end up giving up on my 3000mile goal for the year (which was pretty much out the window when I got injured in Jan) and try to keep mileage in the 60-80mpw range from now till Fall marathon season. For the next several weeks I'll try to fold in the VO2Max workouts instead of so many tempo-type runs. I also believe that 6:40 tempo intervals or tempo runs were too slow for me to get maximal benefit. I think they should have been run at 6:30. Dave - even now, as I try to focus on VO2max 200's, 400's, maybe 800's I don't plan on running 5:20 pace. I think 5:20 would be way, way too fast for me. I plan on hitting 6min/mile pace with full jog recovery at least until and if I get significantly lower race times at 5K or 10K. This, hopefully, won't trash my legs too much and I can keep up my base, easy mileage - we'll see!
As I said earlier, I was intending to not race tonight in order to not risk injury at this point. As part of this effort I went for a real easy 5 mile run this morning to see how things were feeling. My knee felt fine but not 100% normal. I was still intending to run ~19ish and ease up on the downhill sections. I wore Speedstars for a change rather than flats for a bit of extra cushioning.
Come race time I did my usual 2 mile warmup plus some strides and felt good but I lined up a bit further back than normal. Very leisurely start for me but as space opened up I moved up from what must have been about 30th place to about 10th over the first half mile or so. Felt pretty easy. As we went up the hill I continued to pick people off. Having fun now. Hit the first mile in 6:09. Wow. It didn't feel that fast. Still I was intending to push on the uphill and ease up on the downhill so I kept the pace up until the turnaround. At the turnaround I caught the first place woman and hung with her for most of the way back. 6.12 for the second mile. The pace didn't feel too bad and I felt I was holding a little back. I pulled away a little in the final stretch to finish in 5th, a fairly typical place for me, and 18:33 overall, 6:12 for the last 1.1 and a 5:59 pace. The three people in front of me finished in 17:48, 17:53 and 17:56. I hope they are there next week because that's what I need to chase. Running 18:33 and having it not feel like 100% effort was actually a good confidence boost for me. On the other hand if I wake up tomorrow and my knee is sore I'm going to be cursing my stupidity.
Food was tacos, ice cream was good (local company McConnells donates the ice cream), beer was excellent (red nectar), coffee was welcome and I won an 'Old Guys Rule' t-shirt in the raffle. Good times.
18:33 Cruising John! Nice. You are ready to crack 18, you just need the right Nite now! Be careful of that knee though....
It's an interesting discussion that's been going on here and as usual there seems to be many ways to the same goal. My training this year has been as follows:
One thing I would say is the 10k intervals are a nice compromize between harder intervals and tempo type work, and I’d consider throwing these into your training. They have definitely allow your to keep some zip without leaving you too beaten up.
18:33 holding back? Very nice John. Make sure to bring the “old guys rule” shirt next week – you will definitely be on the podium!
So I ran some shorter distance intervals yesterday at 10K pace (with a 2.5/3.5 warm-up and cool down). Even though I waited until 6:45pm to do them, the heat/humidity was amazing. I felt I was growing stronger on the track, but what a slog fest on the way home! With this weather, my “quality” days look more like a “Survivor” audition. Ugh.
Resident of Pennsyltucky
Just FYI, recommended easy pace for someone currently running a 19:00 5k is 8:09, so be careful that you're not going too fast on your easy days. Conversely, it could mean you're in better shape than you think, but you won't really know until you race.
Jeff-thanks for sending that link.
I think its both. I may be better than 19:00 shape but haven't tested it yet. Going too fast on the easy days...may be running into this. The most I've been able to put in is low 30's mileage wise and I think I might be hitting the crossroads of whether I'm going to hit a plateau or going to have to increase my mileage and slow down a little bit to be able to train more effectively. I do have a good speed base (from the link I exceed the threshold pace and can do a 5:33 mile) but not the distance comparison (I can't do 10 miles in 1:05...more like 1:13-1:15 now).
Have a history of exceeding recommended easy paces...in college my easy runs were regularly 6:30-6:50/mile and according to that I should have been racing 5K in the 15:40 area but was low 17's.
John- good job in your race!
All - interesting reading on the responses in training details. I am not sure how some of you guys can train for a marathon! There's no way I have time for 70, 80, 90 MPW.
NACN- what do you consider heavy for a long distance runner? I'm in the low 190s.
Looks like I'll get in about 32 miles this week, that's with running all 7 days and having 2 hockey games (I can only run maybe 4 miles at most on a game day). Season ends next week, I am really hoping to get to 40 mile weeks soon. But based on feedback here I should watch my pace a little bit and watch out for fatigue. I have that tantalizing 3 month period in college when I was consistently over 60 miles per week and easily in the best shape of my life (PR'd in the 3000m and 10K and 1 second off my mile PR but running it indoors...tore my hammy before I could race a 5K). I'd love to see if I could do that again.
© 2012 RunningAHEAD.com. All rights reserved. | Privacy