Forums > Racing > Goal of sub 18:36 minute(6 minute mile average) and sub 18:00 5k
Resident of Pennsyltucky
Robin -
36 miles in 3 days is going to take the zip out of your closing mile or so in a 5K. I wouldn't dwell too much on the 18:25.
I'm working out of burnout mode. I started to feel better last week and am targeting 30 miles again this week (on track so far since Saturday). I feel fresher mentally. Besides running inside on the treadmill almost exclusively - its been extremely humid and kind of warm - I've backed off my average pace from 7:40-7:45 by 10-15 seconds per mile. Don't have the urge to stretch it out to a 5K yet though...we'll see if that changes when it cools off some!
I bought a Garmin 305 in the Costco deal a few weeks back. I've mainly been using it to verify run distances and keep my marathon pace runs on target. I'd been meaning to try it out on one of these 5k races and with tonight having >10mph winds forecast again I thought it would be a good chance, I don't mind wearing the watch but the heart rate monitor always feels a little restricting. The winds seem to be the prevailing weather in the summer in the evening here. It's probably something to do with heating and cooling and yadda yadda yadda. But most days, at the end of the afternoon the winds pick up and then die down again as the sun goes down.
What I mainly wanted to get from the Garmin was some heart rate info but I thought it would also be interesting to see how my pace varied over the course since it is up then down (see earlier posts). Not that I actually wanted any of this data during the race, I set one screen to just have elapsed time on it and nothing else so I wouldn't be distracted by data during the race (I'm easily distracted and even more easily confused). They have someone calling splits at the first mile so I looked at my watch just once over the whole race, at the two mile mark, However I set it to lap auto-lap every 1/2 mile and was wearing the heart rate monitor to collect more data than anyone could possibly want.
As I warmed up it seemed there was no wind. Cool. Well, actually, not, since it was pushing into the low 80's at the end of a beautiful day. I ran up to the mile mark and there was still no wind. But what are all the yachts doing? I turn around and there it is - the wind is blowing from the East. It blows from the West so reliably I hadn't even paid attention to the direction in the forecast, just the magnitude. So it will be behind us going up the hill and in our face coming down the hill - the opposite of usual. Hmm that will be interesting. It happened once last year and I don't remember the outcome being especially favorable.
At the start I recognize a fast local 42 year old and a fast looking college age guy. They are well ahead of the field at the turn around and both finish well under 16 minutes. You never know exactly who will turn up for this race. Sometimes a 17.?? will win, usually a 16.?? would be good enough. Tonight in a field that didn't reach 200 a 17:02 got you 4th place!
Here's my race, I briefly recorded some heart rate data a few years ago and at that time the max heart rate I ever recorded was in the low 180's. This is actually quite consistent with the 205-1/2 age calculation (I was 43 then, I'm 45 now). From what I've recorded I reckon 182 is probably my maximum heart rate.
First 1/2 mile (flat) 5:36 pace, hr: 161 (88% max)
Second half mile (uphill) 6:13 pace hr 169 (93% max)
Making the first mile 5:55 according to the Garmin but the split is called at about 5:59 as I pass. The uphill sure slows the pace but 5:59 is about the fastest I ever reach this point. I'm feeling okay, happy to be under 6 again with a lower wind. Maybe the first 1/2 mile is too fast but if I go much slower I get stuck in too much traffic. The picture is right after the start. The leaders are already accelerating away. I'm in about dead center of the picture (look for the tall guy on the path with a shiny bald head). Any slower and I'd be swallowed up in the pack that would cost me time to get around later. The grass might look nice but it is way too soft for 5k running.
Third half mile (steeply uphill plus 180 turnaround) 6:44 pace hr 169 (93% max)
Interesting. I don't usually take a split here but I knew that the steep incline after the mile mark was the hardest part of the course. I felt I pushed it hard tonight but 6:44 pace! Sheesh, no wonder it is hard for me to go sub-18 on this course. Given that my heart rate didn't increase over this half mile perhaps I'm being too conservative and need to push harder here. On the other hand I usually pass a few people over this section and am rarely passed. And 93% mhr isn't exactly taking it easy....
Fourth half mile (steeply downhill). 5:32 pace hr 170 (93.5% max)
What goes up must come down. I'm usually only aware of the 2 mile split. In this case the second mile (based on the marker on the ground) is in about 6:10. The Garmin has it a bit faster (6:08). After a year of running this course I learned that pushing hard on the first bit of downhill is essential. Every part of your body wants to take a breather but there's so much time that can be lost here. I'm pleased that my heart rate actually increased (albeit only slightly) on the switch from uphill to downhill rather than decreasing.
Fifth halfmile (downhill) 5:48 pace hr 171 (94% max)
Sixth half mile (flat) 5:52 pace hr 172 (94.5% max)
Although there isn't a third mile marked I'm pretty sure I'm usually faster over this third mile than I was tonight. Even though it's downhill the wind is in our` faces tonight and I'm not making up enough time. The picture is taken at about the 2.75 mile mark, half way through this flat final segment. The people on the right hand side of the path are biathletes heading up the course. The islands in the background are the Santa Barbara Channel islands. The person behind me is 58 (finished in 18:34 for an age graded 84%) and the person behind them, being led by the cycle who was shouting encouragement to them, is 11 (finished in 18:37 for an age graded 78%). Isn't this a great sport? I beat them both down to the finish buit they both beat me when the results are age graded.
Last 0.1 mile (downhill) 4:30 pace hr 174 (95.5% max)
I set the Garmin pace zones to try to capture my maximum speed and it looks like I just crept under 4:00 pace for the final 300ft. Admittedly going downhill. And only for a few hundred feet. But still...
Finish in 18:27, 7th overall. Mr Consitency strikes again.
I'm no expert but the heart rate data looks good to me. Rising up rapidly to 93% at the end of the first mile and then gradually, and very slowly increasing to over 95% by the end. Still frustratingly short of 18:00 and I don't think I can blame the wind this week. I should have been faster in the second mile. Possibly mileage is a factor, like RothRunner, I've been piling on the mileage - let's see, 38 in the last 3 days, 22 on Sunday, 7 recovery on Monday and 9 aerobic on Tuesday. If I make the marathon a training priority maybe I should expect some limits to 5k speed.
John
Nite Moves 5k Week 12 - Too much data Finish in 18:27, 7th overall. Mr Consitency strikes again. I'm no expert but the heart rate data looks good to me. Rising up rapidly to 93% at the end of the first mile and then gradually, and very slowly increasing to over 95% by the end. Still frustratingly short of 18:00 and I don't think I can blame the wind this week. I should have been faster in the second mile. Possibly mileage is a factor, like RothRunner, I've been piling on the mileage - let's see, 38 in the last 3 days, 22 on Sunday, 7 recovery on Monday and 9 aerobic on Tuesday. If I make the marathon a training priority maybe I should expect some limits to 5k speed. John
Cheers for the report John. Personally I found the heart rate stuff and breakdowns pretty cool, and they give a really good picture of the particular challenges of that course.
I definitely think the marathon training is probably leaving you a little flat for these races at this stage. I know a lot of people talk about PRing off marathon training, but if you are pretty much anti-tapering for your 5k I'm not so sure.
Personally I'm also pretty much avoiding the sort of sessions you'd normally do for 5k training (3-5k pace, med-short recoveries), in favour of 10k/half marathon/marathon paced stuff, which would also have a bearing I reckon.
kpk33x,
It's good to hear you are turning the corner in your training, hopefully if you can string some weeks together some of that undoubted speed you have will come flooding back. I look forward to your 2009 5k debut at some point in fall.....
ultramarathon/triathlete
DID IT!
Last night was my first ever sub 19 min 5k (on a hilly course I've raced probably 10 times). In fact, I not only broke 19 but I ran 18:36 for a 6:00 ave pace!
Needless to say, I was pretty damn happy and took home another medal. AND it was HOT and HUMID!
I really need to find a nice flat 5k to reall see what I can do! Preferably in cool weather
HTFU? Why not!
Team Odwalla & Empire Tri Club Follow me: @davemendelsohn
Another good one, John. That course sounds really difficult.
Suggestion - Load up your data into SportTracks as it will let you look at the pace/HR at any split you want. You can break the data into mile, 1/2 mile, 1/4 mile, 400m, 800m, 1K etc splits (even 5K or 10K or 1/2Mar splits if you're running a long race). Very cool to see how you did that way. Nowadays I don't bother to auto-lap my GPS because I can go back and see whatever split I want anyway. I manually lap it at the mile markers, like a regular watch.
Kosherdave - way to go!
You should also just automatically upload your GPS data from your Garmin into your running log. That's what I do.
Just a note, I ran a 5k back on 7.20 before I went on a vacation. It was after a 6+ mile recovery run in the morning. The race was in the PM. About 78F. I ran this one differently. The only thing I showed on my Garmin was my current HR and lap HR. Nothing about pace. Auto-lap set to 1 mile. I ran a 18:47, a PR by 2 seconds, but found it interesting that A) I ran this fast just watching HR B) I ran pretty even splits considering C) I stink on getting my HR up into the red zone, I just can't get it up in the upper 170's, low 180's.
That was my last 5k for a while. Probably until mid-November.
Nice PRs kosherdave & dcv! Good stuff! I guess it's marathon build-up time then dvc.....
Yes it is. Nothing like taking a 11/12 day vacation and then jumping right back into work and marathon training... Hopefully I'll survive it..
Rule #15
I just can't get it up.
That sucks. Have you tried Viagra?
Seriously, I am going to have to check out your log and training to see why your 5k is only 18:47, but yet you ran a
2:58 marathon!
Ricky —our ability to perform up to our physiological potential in a race is determined by whether or not we truly psychologically believe that what we are attempting is realistic. Anton Krupicka
Ken, DCV - thanks for the Garmin tips. I downloaded the SportTracks program and that seems to work well. I like being able to switch between different splits. Much better than the Garmin software.
kosherdave - Holy carp, that's a huge pr! I think we need a race report....
Last week - ran 6 days, total of 30 miles. Did my first tempo run in a month (incorporated 3 miles in 19:34 within a 5 miler). Long run was only 7.25. Tired late in the week....very busy at work.
This week - probably in the high 20's for miles if I get in 6 days (have 15.75 since Saturday). Long run of only 6.25 but feeling better overall.
I think backing off from low 7:40's/mile into the 7:55 or so pace for most normal runs helped a lot with the burnout issue. I did one run outside on a nice night and came in at 7:44 pace otherwise I've been on the treadmill. Hottest days of the summer have all been in the past 2 weeks. Still need to get more miles in. Next week is the "back off" week (I take the mileage down every 4th week) but since I am accustomed to 25-30/week I may just do the same but only run 5 days if I can get a long run 8+ in on the weekend.
kosherdave congrats on the 18:36 and dcv on the PR in the heat.
That sucks. Have you tried Viagra? Seriously, I am going to have to check out your log and training to see why your 5k is only 18:47, but yet you ran a 2:58 marathon!
Most likely the main reasons are:
1. I haven't really trained for shorter stuff (5k's), just marathons, which has led to some PRs
2. I really, really detest lactic acid or the feeling the your heart is going to explode which is so big a factor in 5k's. Next spring/summer I'm going to give it a go and see how I do.
3. But I have tried Sudafed and that seems to do wonders at raising the HR to max levels while racing.
I have SportTracks but I stopped using it because I like to have my log online (so I can waste time at work looking at it ). So I just using RunningAhead...
I don't expect to set any PRs in the next couple of weeks, I've started to really ramp-up the mileage for Chicago.
No race report this week. I decided I just couldn't fit in a race plus the marathon training schedule and be a little rested for a 10k on Sunday so decided to double up again and go around the course twice to replace the '12 mile w/7 @15k pace' workout. It seemed this would be good marathon training, a good rehearsal for Sunday, and a way to give me 3 days without a tough workout before Sunday.
I was much better with my pace this time. I was aiming for 19:30 for each lap. I managed the first 5k in19:20 and it felt good. Possibly a textbook 'comfortably hard'. I got back to the start in 2 minutes, and really struggled on the hill into the wind on the second 5k but still snuck it in under 20 at 19:58. This felt like a pretty good workout. It would be real tough for me to do it on my own,even on a flatter course or track, but in a race it is a lot more manageable.
My legs were pretty tired before tonight (Sunday was 18 w/ 8 @marathon pace), Monday was 10 recovery and Tuesday was 15 which I did too fast because I was late for an event). So tonight was tough but I think I made the right decision not to race and am looking forward to 3 easy-ish days followed by a flat, and hopefully fast. 10k. I screwed this race up last year so I'm hoping for revenge. Let's see, bronze goal is to simply pr. I have run few certified 10k's so I need under 39:39 to pr. Silver goal is to get under 39. I think 38 is almost certainly out of reach at the moment so I'm making my gold goal 38:18 - the toughest of the three 10k equivalents to a 2:59:50 marathon Jim put on page 1 of the sub-3 thread!
It sounds like the training is going really well John. Good luck in the 10k. I reckon you'll be in the 38's no problem and possibly even better....
So the session you had on your schedule for yesterday was '12 mile w/7 @15k pace'?!!!
That's pretty harsh isn't it? 12 miles with 7 miles @ roughly 9 mile race pace? That's a race level effort surely?
You've got me worried now that my make it up as you go along approach is gonna leave me with a soft underbelly!!
MTA: Actually thinking about it 2 x 5k in the 19's is pretty similiar in difficulty to '12 mile w/7 @15k pace' - I'm definitely impressed!
The two 5K's in a row at sub 20 seems like a really, really hard effort as well as the 12 w/ 7 at 15k pace. Be careful as you are on a serious roll, don't derail that train!
I wouldn't worry to much about the 5K/8k/10K marathon time predictors that Jim has on page 1 of the sub 3 thread. As you know I've run a couple sub-3's and have only hit the 5K time predictor (and just once with a massive push to get there). I've run a recent 8K that doesn't stack up and I ran one of my best 10K's about 6 weeks after my 2:55 marathon and was only able to achieve 39:23. And I had trained for that race. I think that today I could get into the 38's but I also think I'm in potentially much better marathoning shape than last year.
For me, the 1/2 marathon predictor seems to translate much better than the shorter predictors.
© 2012 RunningAHEAD.com. All rights reserved. | Privacy