Forums > Racing > Interval recovery?
I've Got Worms!
I have just started training for the St. Jude 1/2 in Memphis on Dec. 4. I am following a modified version of Hal Higdon's intermediate training program. Today I did my first intervals, 5 x 400 M. I am supposed to do them at a 5K pace, which for me I think would be about 8:00 to 8:30. My garmin wasn't charged up, so I timed them at about 1:50 per 400M which is about a 7:20 pace. For each rest, I walked a full 400M. The workout didn't seem as hard as my normal runs, so I thought my recovery might have been too long.
I searched the forums and found a post:
From Hal Higdon's book, "Marathon": "In interval training, you carefully control the period of rest time, or interval, between the fast repetitions [2 x 400, etc.] ... Key to this kind of workout is that your heart rate not be allowed to drop too low before you surge into action again. Please note that the 'interval' is the period between reps, not the repetition itself. ... interval training is probably the most efficient workout for developing speed."
On his website it says:
"An interval workout usually consists of fast repeats separated by walking or jogging. The program begins with 5 x 400 meters in the first week and adds one more 400 every other week to reach 10 x 400 meters the week before your half marathon. Walk or jog between each repeat... Run the 400s at about your pace for 5-K, or 10-K."
So I guess I should go harder by either only walking maybe 200 M or jogging the rest time instead of walking? What % heart rate should I be aiming for on both the reps and the rests? Any thoughts?
What was the secret, they wanted to know; in a thousand different ways they wanted to know The Secret. And not one of them was prepared, truly prepared to believe that it had not so much to do with chemicals and zippy mental tricks as with that most unprofound and sometimes heart-rending process of removing, molecule by molecule, the very tough rubber that comprised the bottoms of his training shoes. The Trial of Miles; Miles of Trials
To follow up on Purdey's question, I read somewhere that running fast intervals can help one develop a more efficient stride and, in that respect, it helps longer distances as well because through the training the more efficient stride will eventually be incorporated into the 5K or longer distances.
I am really just interested in 5Ks (at this point). I am trying to break 20 min. I have primarily focused on upping my mileage for a faster 5K. But every couple of weeks I throw in a speed workout which is running 400M repeats at what is for me a very fast pace (around 79-85 seconds). In my typical weekly running I would never approach this pace. I am trying to work up to 8 to 10 repeats during the speed session (and hopefully increase the speed).
Do you think this is worthwhile? Also, is my purpose different from the OPs since I am running them at much faster than 5K pace and thus I should have a different recovery time between intervals?
To follow up on Purdey's question, I read somewhere that running fast intervals can help one develop a more efficient stride
This is a fair point.
I use strides to (hopefully) achieve the efficient stride. I guess that 400 reps could do the same.
are 400s really that important for a 1/2M anyway? Or even for a 5k?
400s are over prescribed for most of us in plans and I personally don't care for them in high volume for half marathon training unless you are a very high mileage runner. Focus more on 10K and 1/2 marathon paced reps/miles in your quality work (like 5-6 X 1K 10K pace or 4 X 1 mile half pace) with 90-120 sec recoveries followed by 4 X 200M fast all in same work out. Throw in some faster paced miles (marathon pace/half marathon pace) in your long run preferrably on hilly terrain. Throw in more striders another day or two per week and there are your two quality work outs with speed for half training for an intermediate runner. Those 4 X 200s, 8 X 100s, 3 X 300s are all you need to bring life/speed to your legs. Hammering 400s would not me on my plan for an intermediate lower mileage runner but the way you are doing them is not that intense because of the walking such a long time.
I have just started training for the St. Jude 1/2 in Memphis on Dec. 4. I am following a modified version of Hal Higdon's intermediate training program. Today I did my first intervals, 5 x 400 M. I am supposed to do them at a 5K pace, which for me I think would be about 8:00 to 8:30. My garmin wasn't charged up, so I timed them at about 1:50 per 400M which is about a 7:20 pace. For each rest, I walked a full 400M. The workout didn't seem as hard as my normal runs, so I thought my recovery might have been too long. I searched the forums and found a post: From Hal Higdon's book, "Marathon": "In interval training, you carefully control the period of rest time, or interval, between the fast repetitions [2 x 400, etc.] ... Key to this kind of workout is that your heart rate not be allowed to drop too low before you surge into action again. Please note that the 'interval' is the period between reps, not the repetition itself. ... interval training is probably the most efficient workout for developing speed." On his website it says: "An interval workout usually consists of fast repeats separated by walking or jogging. The program begins with 5 x 400 meters in the first week and adds one more 400 every other week to reach 10 x 400 meters the week before your half marathon. Walk or jog between each repeat... Run the 400s at about your pace for 5-K, or 10-K." So I guess I should go harder by either only walking maybe 200 M or jogging the rest time instead of walking? What % heart rate should I be aiming for on both the reps and the rests? Any thoughts?
Lloyd, always jog between intervals. You don't walk in races (ideally) so don't walk in training.
Without bickering about the contents of Hal Higdon's plans and how I'd design them differently ...
I followed his Intermediate plan for my first HM (last fall). I felt the plan was solid, and it delivered me to the starting line reasonably well-trained and without injury. Personally, though, I too found the 400 interval workouts to be less challenging than I'd expected, but I think I was expecting more pain based on old track memories. FWIW, I did mine in 1:45-1:50 with jogging recoveries of 1:30 (which I pared down to 1:15 and then 1:00 as the plan progressed).
If I can ask you a couple questions:
Tomorrow never comes. Eventually never happens. Today. Now. Shut up and start.
mileage hound
Ditto the comment on slow jogging 200m for 400m repeats to end up around 75% of TIME for recovery. Down to 60% if you are very fit. Lactate is introduced into the blood/muscles as a function of speed and time, and lactate cleared as a function of time. Nowhere does distance play in this equation, it is simply the product of time X speed.
With those long recoveries and only doing 5 repeats, no wonder it felt easy. Bring the recoveries down, and think about doing at least 8 repeats. Even without knowing your current fitness 5X400 is awfully short as a workout for a HM. 6X800 would be an even more relevant workout.
2012 goals: Fastest race times since 2006.
"If you want to be a bad a$s, then do what a bad a$s does. There's your pep talk for today. Go Run." -- Slo_Hand
If I understood your post, your 5k race-pace is 8:00-8:30 ... but you ran these 400m repeats at 7:20 pace. If that's right, why?
That is a problem I see all the time. Either runners don't know their true, 10K, 5K, 1 mile pace or how it feels so they just hammer the prescribed intervals too fast. Longer and a bit slower stamina/strength reps/miles are of more value for most of us especially the intermediate runner still trying to find himself and find his paces.
If I can ask you a couple questions: You said you were following a modified plan -- what mods did you make and why? If I understood your post, your 5k race-pace is 8:00-8:30 ... but you ran these 400m repeats at 7:20 pace. If that's right, why?
1) I modified it by stretching it out to 18 weeks and simply slowing the distance progression. My wife is starting 18 week Galloway program, and It just seemed to make sense starting at the same time.
2) The only reason I ran them at about 7:20 was because I overshot my pace on the first interval. It felt good, so I repeated it on the next intervals. The only reason I walked a full 400 for rest was I had never done these before or had anyone explain them to me. The advice here is awesome, I really appreciate everyone's help.
I decided on my 5K pace by looking back at my recent runs of about 4 miles, not including warm-up and cool-down. It was around 8:45, so I felt I could probably manage 8:00 to 8:30 on a 5K.
2) The only reason I ran them at about 7:20 was because I overshot my pace on the first interval. It felt good, so I repeated it on the next intervals.
I can totally relate.
Depending on your fitness level when you started, stretching the plan out to 18 weeks could be brilliance. More work and less injury is a great combination.
When you get the recovery right you'll find that effort harder and whatever you can average (don't let youself go fast on the first one and run slowest for the last ones) should be in the ballpark of current 5K.
© 2012 RunningAHEAD.com. All rights reserved. | Privacy