Forums >General Running>Running Events and Live Music
Reluctant Scrooge
E-mail: eric.fuller.mail@gmail.com -----------------------------
Supposedly research shows the optimal cadence for distance runners is 180 steps per minute... !
At the few races I've been to where there's been music playing, I've often found myself wondering "why bother?" Even at my slow pace I may hear the music for a minute, then it's a couple of miles to the next source. I figure it's more for the spectator's benefit then mine.
I've been doing a lot of my running lately at the local 'Y's indoor track (16 laps per mile), and they have up-beat music going for all the other exercisers around. I've noticed that when the tempo is slightly faster or slower than my cadence I'll often speed up or slow down to match it. When there's a significant difference between them, though, the music's tempo becomes almost irrelevent.
DWARP Marathon Madness Mob
I've run past gospel singers (gave me chills of delight, and I ain't religious) along with other random musicians (ie, dude beatin' on drum kit) in the Broad Street Run in Philly
Beatin' on the Rock
"He conquers who endures" - Persius "Every workout should have a purpose. Every purpose should link back to achieving a training objective." - Spaniel
http://ncstake.blogspot.com/
BTW - as I've been taught the 180 BPM is a lower threshold for racers and something us mortals should try to attain. I've read this in Pirie, Lydiyard, etc. My takeaway is to promote quick turnover and shorter time on the ground - sort of like cycling cadence