New runner, training for 1/2 Marathon (Read 1808 times)


For The Thunder!

posted: 12/13/2008 at 12:18 PM
Consistent weekly mileage will get you there. If you are just looking to finish you don't really need a plan. Just keep adding mileage, and pay attention to your body. If you need to plateau for a couple of weeks, do it. I like the idea of running by time and not necessarily miles. Try to add a couple of days in the week. Even if it's only 20 minutes or so. That will help with consistency. Run most of your miles easy. Throw in some strides here and there, making sure you are warmed up first.

Good luck
Run fast sometimes.

Don't let the bastard win.
Callalily


posted: 1/4/2009 at 12:38 AM
I recommend one of John Binham's plans in "Marathoning for Mortals." No, you can't find the plan for free online; you have to buy the book. If you are newer to running, consider using a walk/run ratio during training and during the half marathon. I did this and I think it was one of the best decisions I ever made. I latched onto the 4 min run/1 min walk ratio during all of my long runs because it felt comfortable and was easy to follow - and I feel that using a run/walk ratio is easier on the body. I think a 3-day plan is fine - so long as you are doing some cross training. I did a 3-day plan for my first HM, but I also did 1-2 miles of swimming each week and I tried to diligently do 2 core workouts a week.
RobinandAmelia


posted: 1/4/2009 at 11:20 PM
Hi, new here and this is my first post. I too am training for a 1/2 marathon, on May 3 (Sudbury Rocks). I also have been running since July 08. I have been in 4 5K races and one 10K race. I find the races keep me motivated to train. In my training I am up to 7 miles and feel that 13 miles is quite achievable by May 3. The area I live in is very hilly so I get a lot of hill training automatically as well.
The Nikeplus site has training schedules available as well.

Robin
posted: 1/5/2009 at 8:00 PM
Just wanted to do a quick update and also thank everyone for some great advice!

I ended up using the 'SmartCoach' feature on Runnersworld.com which is a personalized training plan based on my latest (actually my *only*) 5K time and current running level.

So I have been doing slow steady runs at a painfully slow pace of 14:00mm! But they are great runs, and basically I will be increasing my long run each weekend and will use some run/walk ratios as necessary for those long runs! The other two runs each week are basically 2-3 miles each, also at a very slow pace. There are only 3 speed workouts in 16 weeks, and a couple of tempo runs - but other than that, the next 4 months will be slow, steady endurance building!

I just wanted to post this update mainly for anyone new coming around who may be looking for 1/2 marathon training ideas for the new year!

Thanks everyone for some great input - the one consistent theme in everything I hear and read for 'new runners' is SLOWWWW and STEADY for the whole first year running. I like that because it takes some 'pressure' off (self-imposed pressure ha ha).

Thanks again!
Cyndi
One Hour Running, Finishing by Jan 3rd!
www.brokenscale.blogspot.com


posted: 1/5/2009 at 8:17 PM
Just curious...What's the rush to run long-distance races? I didn't run a race over 10k until I had been running maybe 5 (6?) years. I didn't do my first marathon until I had been running 12 years. I never felt like I was missing out, and in the long run (pun!), it seemed to make the transition to longer races easier.

I'm not saying that's preferrable or better or worse or whatever..But why is the desire to go from no running to a half marathon (or marathon) in 12 months so common?
posted: 1/5/2009 at 8:43 PM
For many, setting a goal that seems impossible--or at least difficult enough to be a true challenge and pushes you beyond your current capabilities is great motivation.

Had I not set a goal to run a (full) marathon 6 months after I started running, I am 100% certain I would not be a runner today. I would have run for a couple of weeks and quit altogether. But having posted my intentions and telling everyone I knew that I was going to run a marathon--resulted in a self-fulfilling prophecy. I 'had' to succeed or I would have to eat crow, and admit failure.

Last year I was inconsistant--but I am still a runner nearly 3 years later--and would not be if not for my initial long-distance goal.

Good luck with your half Cyndi!
marathon maniac #1293
posted: 1/5/2009 at 9:10 PM
The short answer to your question TanyaS would be, Why Not?

I have set this goal for myself personally because it keeps me focused on running, aka NOT QUITTING. Secondly...I will not be running a 1/2 Marathon in May by doing 'no running'. Five months ago I could barely run 2 minute intervals, and now I can run for an hour straight. With slow steady consistent running, who knows what the NEXT 5 months will bring?

Will I be fast? NO. Will I be competitive in my age group? NO. Do I care? NOPE! Wink

At this point, it's all about stretching myself to try something new, challenging and rewarding. It's all about participating in a fun event with hundreds of other runners and basking in my own pride when I cross the line at the end, knowing that I set my sights on something previously unimagineable, and succeeded. It's that simple.

Nothing I am doing with my running is 'rushing'....THAT is for sure. I am doing this because I CAN - last year, I could NOT. In fact, I don't even think last year at this time I even knew what the distance of a 1/2 marathon was!
Cyndi
One Hour Running, Finishing by Jan 3rd!
www.brokenscale.blogspot.com


posted: 1/5/2009 at 9:22 PM
Gotcha. I totally understand the desire (addiction) to push one's self toward difficult goals.

I guess the curiosity to me is the shift in running goals for new runners over the decades. 20 years ago, loads of people ran, but rarely did they run half/full marathon distances right away. That's kind of a recent phenomenon, so I was just wondering why the change.

Good luck!
posted: 1/5/2009 at 9:35 PM
I think a lot of it could be simply the culture of running and how it has evolved over the years. Running has become infinitely more popular over the years, both as a 'lifestyle' and in competitive sports. Participating in races has become very popular over the years, especially people who do destination races. I know I for one will always want to run where I travel, or even go out of state just to participate in one of the bigger races. Eventually....
Cyndi
One Hour Running, Finishing by Jan 3rd!
www.brokenscale.blogspot.com



Run Stupider

posted: 1/5/2009 at 11:02 PM
Running has advanced a lot. Now we know to drink occasionally (so as to not pass out like Salazar), rotate shoes, change socks every water stop, alternate water and gatorade, eat carbs within 30 minutes of running, wear many layers and strip throughout the race, shake hands with water stop volunteers, or pat their heads if their young, adjust the mile stops if our Garmin reveals them to be wrong, for the benefit of the runners behind us (always improve the world for those who come after), step towards the side of the pack before upchucking, and, above all, TAKE OFF THE BIKE HELMET BEFORE LEAVING T2!
The chair is EVIL. EVIL!!
posted: 1/6/2009 at 1:41 PM
Hmm. Thanks for those insights, Cyndi and Amores! Essentially, then, we can say that running has evolved in that the lures of the long-distance race have become the challenge of finishing, creating a "lifestyle," and an objective for vacation.Conversely (if I may be so bold as to interpret Amores' subtle intonation), one might say that running has devolved in that the challenge of actually racing shorter distances (a challenge certainly equal to covering many slow miles) continues to diminish in popularity.

And why, one might ask, has the challenege of distance replaced the challenge of speed? Therein lies the kernel, nay, the nuclear bomb, of ire, of rankled debate, of deceased equines.

Fascinating.
posted: 1/6/2009 at 2:04 PM
Has racing road races actually diminished in popularity or has the phenomenon of just finishing marathons and half marathons increased disproportionately in popularity? I don't know, I'm asking. It seems to me that outside a brief period that the old timers reminisce about--the running boom of the 80's--actual road racing has always been a fringe sport known only to a select few weirdos. The interesting part about this current running boom (the just finish boom) is that it seems to only apply to larger events. Where I live there are still loads of good ole fashioned road races, many of which have been around for years or even decades and are mostly unchanged. They are still basically no-frills road races for runners by runners. Then there are the big "event" like races, many of which are newer but some of which are events that used to be "just road races" and have turned into events. To me these are really two different worlds, and it's only at certain big events that these two worlds even cross paths and even then they don't really interfere with each other--the racers are up front and the just finishers are in the back. The migration toward event status has increased the cost of some races, but you still have lots of inexpensive races if you want to avoid the high costs too.
Luti 2010. It won't come down to a kick this year. Thunder by 20+ seconds. Put that in your pipe and smoke it -Thunder, March 18, 2010
posted: 1/6/2009 at 3:56 PM
True, there are still the small, old races that have been around forever that all the racers race. However, there are far more walkers, and just-finishers even at 5ks than there ever have been. Maybe that's a regional thing? My sense is that the Just Finish boom has been increased disproportionately due to the obesity boom...In which case, a LOT more people should be out there just finishing.

And by the way..how DARE you call me a select weirdo.
posted: 1/6/2009 at 4:38 PM
modified: 1/6/2009 at 4:46 PM
My random thoughts ... there's certainly an 'industry' around the big distance events. Paid training programs, corporate sponsored teams, charity fundraisers etc. A co-worker went to Honolulu as part of a team to 'run' the marathon - to my knowledge her only race.

Almost all 'non-runners' wouldn't find finishing a 5k as motivating, while everyone knows a marathon is a challenge. They're not going to win either event and so racing and PRs are not a factor in what draws them to an event.

I coach youth track and we talk a lot with parents who ask about improving their fitness. For non-runners, completing the Army Ten Miler or The Marine Corps Marathon are achievements that motivate them and ones the person next in line at Starbucks will recognize. Placing in an age-group at the local small-town 5k/10k is not. As a consequence it seems most recreational runners just do miles, and neglect strength, flexibility or speed.

I'm just getting started, out of shape, 45 year old couch potato, and a 6' 4" mesomorph. While I'm confident I could complete a half marathon off little training, and a marathon off a little more, from where I look today I am much more motivated to train toward racing (rather than just running) a 5k, however modest my finishing time will be.

But good friends who have been running for years get their pleasure from training at high mileage at the same pace and completing the 'event' marathons, even if breaking 4 hours is unlikely. Each to their own.


...and again...and again

posted: 1/6/2009 at 6:34 PM
modified: 1/6/2009 at 6:36 PM
Quote from TanyaS on 1/5/2009 at 8:17 PM:
Just curious...What's the rush to run long-distance races? I didn't run a race over 10k until I had been running maybe 5 (6?) years. I didn't do my first marathon until I had been running 12 years. I never felt like I was missing out, and in the long run (pun!), it seemed to make the transition to longer races easier.

I'm not saying that's preferrable or better or worse or whatever..But why is the desire to go from no running to a half marathon (or marathon) in 12 months so common?


Because 5k's hurt like a bitch.

MTA:
Yet I contend that running the 400 and/or 800 competitively is a hell all its own.
Hit Bull, Win Steak!