New runner, training for 1/2 Marathon (Read 1808 times)

beatlemaniac


I miss Summer

posted: 1/8/2009 at 12:36 AM
Quote from Trent on 1/6/2009 at 10:10 PM:
There is nothing rare or unique about finishing a marathon. Hundreds of thousands of people do it every year. Marathon finishers are a dime a dozen.


Huh? So is that all old BS or outdated BS about 1/10 of 1% of the world population can complete a marathon? Do I have nothing (other than an 18:00 5K) to aspire to in my running future? There is no badge of honor in running a marathon?
2010 Goals:
800 miles for year
A few 5Ks and 10Ks
Another HM
First marathon in 2010!
beatlemaniac


I miss Summer

posted: 1/8/2009 at 12:39 AM
Quote from mikeymike on 1/6/2009 at 10:25 PM:
To the non-runner, the marathon has an allure that other races just do not. And because the half marathon has the word "marathon" in it, it works almost as well at cocktail parties.


Yep - I have only done a HM and there are people who say "he runs marathons...". I don't bother to explain...
2010 Goals:
800 miles for year
A few 5Ks and 10Ks
Another HM
First marathon in 2010!


hydration is important

posted: 1/8/2009 at 1:08 AM
Quote from beatlemaniac on 1/8/2009 at 12:39 AM:
Yep - I have only done a HM and there are people who say "he runs marathons...". I don't bother to explain...


To a lot of unschooled people any road race is a "marathon," so if one does one only for street cred I'm not sure it's the most efficient means of getting it. Seems that the average person would be more impressed by a person doing a 5k "marathon" every weekend than a 26.2 mile marathon every couple of months. Tongue
Kirsten
'07: 1324.5 mi
'08: 1561 mi
'09: 1810.9 mi

'10 Goals:

2000k (1243mi.) running
1500 miles biking
1st sprint duathlon (5k run, 30k bike, 5k run)
1st century ride
PRs: 15k, 25k, HM


Warming Up

posted: 1/8/2009 at 1:58 AM
Quote from beatlemaniac on 1/8/2009 at 12:36 AM:
Huh? So is that all old BS or outdated BS about 1/10 of 1% of the world population can complete a marathon? Do I have nothing (other than an 18:00 5K) to aspire to in my running future? There is no badge of honor in running a marathon?


1/10 of 1% of the world's population is a little less than 7 million.

Apparently, there is no badge of honor, but you can get a finisher's medal.
Seek wisdom. Think for yourself. Avoid maxims.
Scout7


CPT Curmudgeon

posted: 1/8/2009 at 1:50 PM
I'm still waiting for my badge.

If you're completing a marathon to garner the honor or respect of other people, you're going to be sorely disappointed.
posted: 1/8/2009 at 1:57 PM
Less than 1% of the world's population owns a computer. I want a damn trophy.
posted: 1/8/2009 at 2:17 PM
Quote from TanyaS on 1/8/2009 at 1:57 PM:
Less than 1% of the world's population owns a computer. I want a damn trophy.


You need to own a mac for to get a trophy. Owning a computer will only get you a computer owner's medal.


old school badger

posted: 1/8/2009 at 3:15 PM
If you are a 1 in a million kind of a person that means there are 7,000 people on the earth exactly like you. And I think all 7,000 of us deserve a medal for being so freakin' fabulous.
2010 goal = 4:59 for 1,500 meters.
posted: 1/8/2009 at 3:23 PM
Quote from Doug B on 1/8/2009 at 3:15 PM:
If you are a 1 in a million kind of a person that means there are 7,000 people on the earth exactly like you. And I think all 7,000 of us deserve a medal for being so freakin' fabulous.


What have done with the other 6.3 billion people Doug?


old school badger

posted: 1/8/2009 at 3:24 PM
oh shit there's 70,000 of us? damn. that's too much fabulousness. I better start looking into a new planet for us. prefereably a planet where math is illegal.
2010 goal = 4:59 for 1,500 meters.
Jeff


fu don't kung think

posted: 1/8/2009 at 3:30 PM
Oh my god there are 70,000 trents.
posted: 1/8/2009 at 3:42 PM
Quote from Nobby415 on 1/7/2009 at 7:57 PM:
That young lady who took Mikey’s comment as “resentment toward slower ‘runners’”, I’m sorry, but it seems to me you are the one, along with some (quite a few, as a matter of fact) others as far as I’m concerned, who has a huge chip on your shoulder. Just the fact that you’re afraid you might finish last in some local race shows that YOU are the one who have a complex toward being slow. What’s wrong with finishing last? At least you’re out there, trying! That’s the whole argument, isn’t it? Or is it about not trying to run fast? It sounded to me that you have resentment toward those who try to go faster.

.....

Many people don’t give a damn about improving their performance and that’s perfectly fine. But just the fact, by glancing at this thread, I’ve found 4 or 5 people, including the original poster, saying, right from the get-go, that they “can’t run fast” or “running fast scares me”. If this is not setting out a low standard for yourself, I don’t know what is. Most people go through their lives, NEVER realizing their full potential because they NEVER apply themselves to excel. These people are destined to be ordinary. That’s fine—that is why it’s called “ordinary”! Setting out to run 10 miles, or a half marathon, or a full marathon, or running a 5k fast…those alone are already an extraordinary feat. If I remember it correctly (someone with correct statistics???), only 3% of entire population (of the US, I believe) finish a marathon. Even just running, I’ll bet probably somewhere around 10% actually engage running as a regular activity. Don’t ever settle for some low standard. You’ve already taken that all-important first step—to get out and start running. Don’t sell yourself short. You CAN do better. Some may call me an elitist S.O.B. but, oh, well, what can I do…?


I wasn't reacting to anyone in particular. If I gave the impression I had a chip on my shoulder, I'm sorry - I suspect it's directly related to the two weeks I'm taking off running to give my knee a chance to heal. You're right in that I'm too worried about others laughing at me for my lack of speed - but I certainly don't resent runners that try to go faster. If I did, I'd have to resent 99% of the people on this board. Tongue

I was just trying to explain why I care more about running further than running faster. Why is it setting a low standard to accept that I'm slow? I know I'll get faster as I increase my weekly mileage, but it's a fact that my body has limitations. Besides that, I don't particularly care about getting much faster. That's not why I run. I'd consider it setting a low standard for myself if I decided that I will never run futher than 10 miles, because that's a goal I care about and am working towards.
posted: 1/8/2009 at 3:49 PM
Wow - this thread moved fast while I was home sick yesterday. As I said in my reply to Dakota (like 6 pages ago), I had a lot to think about in terms of what I wanted to do in my running. I really enjoyed pushing it hard to get a little more speed on my little interval training a week or so ago. I'm thinking that I may want to focus on that for a while, but still enjoy good easy runs, too. The ladies on LLR can attest that I've been asking about speed for the last few weeks, so this thread added a lot to my thoughts. I'm glad that this has become such a good discussion. That is why I like RA.
Kerry


posted: 1/8/2009 at 4:18 PM
Quote from fallstoclimb on 1/8/2009 at 3:42 PM:
Why is it setting a low standard to accept that I'm slow? I know I'll get faster as I increase my weekly mileage, but it's a fact that my body has limitations. .


How will you know what the limitations are until you push them? I'll bet you could be fast.
posted: 1/8/2009 at 4:36 PM
Quote from AmoresPerros on 1/7/2009 at 2:41 AM:
I'd be impressed as hell by someone crawling a 5K in a swamp in a realistic alligator outfit.


Here's your opportunity - The Dismal Swamp Stomp - Half Marathon & 5k.

http://dismalswampstomp.kalerunning.com/