2010 Goal of Sub 4:00 Marathon (Read 3385 times)

GST


    I'm in.  I've got to break 4 hours this year.  Maybe Vermont...

     I tried to send you a message... but am too stupid to figure it out.  You talking about the Vermont Marathon in May?  Do they have pace groups?  If not, I'll be there running for fun and can help pace if you want.

      I'm in.  I've got to break 4 hours this year.  Maybe Vermont...

       

      Welcome, Jill_B.  If you ran the Flying Monkey in 4:12, I bet a sub-4 is a cakewalk on a sane course.


      I fly.

         

        Welcome, Jill_B.  If you ran the Flying Monkey in 4:12, I bet a sub-4 is a cakewalk on a sane course.

         

         

        Thanks, here's hoping!

        Bring it on.

        Ojo


        Where's Waldo?

          I would also love to break 4:00.  My best time was last year in Providence with a 4:13.  I know it is a stretch but it is always nice to have an ultimate goal in mind.  I hope to chip some of that time away next month and then get closer to goal in the fall. 

          Sara

          MM #2929

            Sounds good, Ojo.  Let us know how you did next month.


            Extremist

              I'm hoping for a sub-4 at the Lincoln (NE) Marathon May 2.  I'm also thinking it may be foolish to have any goal beyond finishing for my first marathon.

              Half marathons are more fun and 10% as much pain. (Spaniel)


              Giddyup.

                 

                Welcome, Jill_B.  If you ran the Flying Monkey in 4:12, I bet a sub-4 is a cakewalk on a sane course.

                 

                I won't say 'cakewalk', but my experience with monkey is that I took a 10-15 minute penalty for the hills.  ymmv and it depends on how you ran monkeymonkeymonkey (and your training since), but my point is that this seems totally doable.

                Ultima tastes like failure.


                I fly.

                   

                  I won't say 'cakewalk', but my experience with monkey is that I took a 10-15 minute penalty for the hills.  ymmv and it depends on how you ran monkeymonkeymonkey (and your training since), but my point is that this seems totally doable.

                   

                   

                  I'm not the most consistent runner when it comes to marathons. 

                   

                  I trained pretty well for The Asbury Park Relay Marathon, which was in October of last year.  Then I "tapered" for the Monkey (I didn't run more than 8 miles at a time for the next 5 weeks).  I never did any hill work either.  I think that my memory from the previous Monkey actually made it easier than it otherwise would have been (in my mind the hills were worse).  Also, I wasn't sure if I would finish, so I had no real expectations.  So, what does that mean for me and Vermont?  Well, I've been training for a May 2 marathon (it was supposed to be the Flying Pig, now it's NJ), but with less gusto than my training for the APRM, in part because training through the winter stinks, in part because my hip has been bothering me on and off.  Although, to be honest, my hip bothered me last summer too.  But, I'm hoping that my plan of running back-to-back marathons pays off with a faster time in Vermont.

                   

                  Regardless, I don't think that the Monkey is the best guide for how fast I can do another marathon... 

                   

                  So my plan now - 17 miles this weekend.  22 next weekend.  Taper taper taper.  Run NJ.  Go to Disney for a week.  Run a 15 miler.  Taper taper.  Run Vermont.

                   

                  Smile

                  Bring it on.

                  runningmomofboys


                    Hello all!  I'm joining to keep myself accountable!   I'm running Big Sur in 2 weeks (NO plans for sub4 there!)  Would LOVE to do sub4 at Grandma's on June 19 (but don't think that's realistic unless I really rock at Big Sur!).  So, the plan is to go sub4 at Twin Cities on Oct. 3.  Chicago was my first full marathon last October -- ran it in 4:26 with the last 6 miles on a calcaneal sfx -- so I'm hoping that slowed me down!!

                      Welcome, runningmomofboys and LedLincoln! 

                       

                      RMoB, like you I have a spring marathon in June, but I know a sub-4 is not in the cards (even though it's a sweetheart course).  **If** I continue building my mileage through the summer, I should be in the best position for a sub-4 in October.

                       

                      The latest issue of Running Times profiles some people who did PRs at Boston.  They all had quite high mileage going into it.  (sigh)


                      On the road back

                        I'll throw my name in here, even though I think 2011 is a more realistic year for breaking 4, but it can be a stretch goal at least in 2010.  I ran my first in Nov 09 with a time of 4:48, but now that I know what to expect, I think I could realistically get that down to 4:30 without much effort.  I'll run my second one in the fall, so we'll see what happens.


                          Was hoping for a sub 4 at Boston but a sucky, injury-riddled training cycle has me planning on 4:15 - 4:30. Thought about trying again for a Fall marathon but I may spend the summer improving my 5k and 10K paces instead.


                            Well, people who PR at Boston are freaks exceptional, which is why the RT article had a good angle on it.  Go & have a blast, EGH3; forget the sucky training cycle.  Report back, too.

                             

                            yapper, do you talk during races? 

                            bhearn


                              Well, people who PR at Boston are freaks exceptional, which is why the RT article had a good angle on it.  Go & have a blast, EGH3; forget the sucky training cycle.  Report back, too.

                                

                              I actually think Boston is a pretty fast course. After all, it is net downhill, and really there's not that much uphill. The only problem is, because of where the hills are, it's a very, very easy course to massively screw up. I've had the best luck there (including a 5-minute PR) by using a negative-split pacing plan. It sounds crazy, with the hills in the second half, but if you save your energy for the hills, then you can fly in the last 5 miles.

                              "When I got too tired to run anymore I just pretended I wasn't tired and kept running anyway" -- Ennay's 7-year-old daughter

                                  

                                I actually think Boston is a pretty fast course. After all, it is net downhill, and really there's not that much uphill. The only problem is, because of where the hills are, it's a very, very easy course to massively screw up. I've had the best luck there (including a 5-minute PR) by using a negative-split pacing plan. It sounds crazy, with the hills in the second half, but if you save your energy for the hills, then you can fly in the last 5 miles.

                                Yup. And yeah, I've read your previous posts on the negative split strategy. My plan is to start real slow @ around 9:30 to 9:45 pace and slowly creep that up. During my one 21 miler, I ran a negative split:  9:25 or so for the 1st 12, 9:09 for the last 9. It was almost a progression. I was sore and my hip flexors were hurting but I felt like I could've run more if I had to. And I included some tough hills in that run, much tougher than Newton's (though earlier in my training run). I've run the Newton Hills 3x in training so at least I have some familiarity and will hopefully I stay within my fitness level to get through the hills and not have the last 5 miles suck.