1

Calories Burned on your Garmin (Read 52 times)

FreeSoul87


!!LookAtmyAss!!

    I always read that 1 mile burns on average 100 calories, but for example I ran 9 miles last weekend and my garmin said I burned around 1016. Is that close to correct, or off by a bit or a lot?

    2013 Races:

    Go! St. Louis Half Marathon - April 7, 2013 - 2:18:28 (10:32 min/mile)

    Newburgh Rivertown Trail 5k - May 4, 2013 - 25:26 (8:12 min/mile) 1st AG 

    YMCA 5k on the Runway - May 11, 2013 (Goal: 26:59) - Time: 26:40 / 8:38 min/mile pace

      1016 / 9 = ~113 cal/mile according to your Garmin.  That's within Kentucky windage of the 100 you had as you ballpark.  Neither number is accurate or specific...they're ballpark figures.  Both are as right as the other one.

      Did an angel whisper in your ear and hold you close and take away your fear...In those long last moments

      FatSweatyBullDog


      Will Run For Bacon

        Well that is about 113 calories a mile, which seems fairly in line with what you are saying.  However it is just a rough estimate

         

        When I don't use a heart rate monitor is says I burn about 120 calories a mile.  When I do use a heart rate monitor it says I burn about 80 calories a mile.  So its not exactly an easy thing to track

        Here is probably more than you wanted to know

        http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2010/11/how-calorie-measurement-works-on-garmin.html

        Nakedbabytoes


        levitation specialist

          That figure is based on a 150lb male.

          I am a female and weigh 115. I burn about 72 cals per mile average. It bases your cal burn figure mainly taking into account your age, height, weight, sex, pace, distance, and heart rate(if you have a HRM active). But it isn't completely foolproof. Here is my burn numbers from a recent run:

          Mile 1: 907 pace, 141 avg HR, 75 cals

          Mile 2:  909 pace, 145 avg HR, 78 cals

          Mile 3:  903 pace, 148 avg HR, 78 cals

          Mile 4:  912 pace, 144 avg HR, 74 cals

          Mile 5:  901 pace, 146 avg HR, 74 cals

          Mile 6:  916 pace, 145 avg HR, 72 cals

          Mile 7: 912 pace, 144 avg HR, 69 cals

          Mile 8: 905 pace, 146 avg HR, 69 cals

          Mile 9: 907 pace, 140 avg HR, 52 cals

          Mile 10: 857 pace, 146 avg HR, 61 cals

          Mile 11: 924 pace, 139 avg HR, 48 cals

          Mile 12: 929 pace, 139 avg HR, 46 cals

          Mile 13: 929 pace, 138 avg HR, 44 cals

          Mile 14: 922 pace, 144 avg HR, 56 cals

          Mile 15: 958 pace, 141 avg HR, 51 cals

          Mile 16: 919 pace, 144 avg HR, 56 cals

           

          Now if everything is equal:

           

          Mile 6: 916 pace, 145 avg HR, 72 cals

          Mile 16: 919 pace, 144 avg HR, 56 cals

           

          18 cals for 3 secs and 1 HB per minute different?

           

          OR

           

          Mile 1: 907 pace, 141 avg HR, 75 cals

          Mile 9: 907 pace, 140 avg HR, 52 cals

           

          23 cals different for basically the same distance, pace & HR? Why?

          See, not foolproof, even if it is just math.

          FreeSoul87


          !!LookAtmyAss!!

            I do like how you can go in and set your weight, height, age on the garmin. That is nice, I'm not too worried about it, just curious. Myfitnesspal is usually around 25 calories less, and my cardiotrainer app is around 25 less too.

            2013 Races:

            Go! St. Louis Half Marathon - April 7, 2013 - 2:18:28 (10:32 min/mile)

            Newburgh Rivertown Trail 5k - May 4, 2013 - 25:26 (8:12 min/mile) 1st AG 

            YMCA 5k on the Runway - May 11, 2013 (Goal: 26:59) - Time: 26:40 / 8:38 min/mile pace