Login
Home
Training Log
Resources
Measure Route
Run Spots
Find Routes
Calculators
Community
Events
Clubs
Join Now!
Forums
User Groups
Browse User Logs
2024 in 2024
Forums
>
Technical Support
>
Pace vs speed for walks
1
Pace vs speed for walks (Read 590 times)
SkBunny
posted: 1/9/2007 at 7:49 PM
Am I right that in workouts in the column pace, the numbers for walks are rather speed, not pace? I am getting pace of 4:14 for a 20 minute 1.4 mile walk. Pretty fast, isn't it? Ewa
I would rather wear out than rust out. - Helen Klein You create your own universe as you go along. - Winston Churchill
Wingz
Professional Noob
posted: 1/9/2007 at 7:59 PM
This looks like a bug to me. It's interesting that only your "walks" were affected. The rest of the entries seem fine. I don't think you're putting anything in wrong, so my guess is "bug."
Roads were made for journeys...
dillydoodles
posted: 1/9/2007 at 8:22 PM
I'm pretty sure with walking that 4:14 is miles per hour, not min/mile. That's how I always interpret my walks as opposed to runs.
eric :)
posted: 1/14/2007 at 1:35 AM
Only runs are expressed as pace while everything else is speed. If you look at the pace column carefully, it's actually 4.14 (which is miles per hour) and not 4:14 (minutes per mile).
Forums
>
Technical Support
>
Pace vs speed for walks
© 2024 RunningAHEAD, LLC. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service
|
Privacy
|
Feedback
|
Help