Login
|
Help
Home
Training Log
Resources
Measure Route
Find Routes
Calculators
Community
Join Now!
Forums
User Groups
Browse User Logs
User Groups
>
2000 miles of being part of the fauna
>
Forum
>
How realistic is this goal? For real.
2000 miles of being part of the fauna
Home
Forum
Maps
Reports
YTD Distance
1
2
3
4
5
6
How realistic is this goal? For real. (Read 1306 times)
Len
Damn Yankee
posted: 5/31/2008 at 2:55 PM
The Firecracker 5k in Shreveport, Louisiana on July 4 is an important goal of mine this year. It's a pretty big race, over 3000 entrants, but the cool thing is that there are no age group awards. The first 101 male/ 60 female finishers are given an etched glass mug. That requires a finish in the 20:30-21:00 range. Last year I completely blew up after running the first mile in around 6:00, and dragged my sorry ass across the finish in 23:55. It was by far my worst race of the year and I want revenge, and a glass mug to put my beer in.
This has been my first real week back after a foot injury that left me limping around for two weeks. I ran a small 5k a couple of weeks ago in 22:55.
Is it realistic for me to think I can shave 2+ minutes off of my time in a month? It sounds crazy to me, but I am still hanging onto the hope that I can pull it off. How do I approach the next month to give myself the best chance to do it?
Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending. Carl Bard
mikeymike
Laser show. Relax.
posted: 5/31/2008 at 6:03 PM
Wow if you're playing "stump the swamp" I think you might have won. Two minutes off your current best 5k time in just about a month after a few weeks of little to no running because of an injured foot?
It might be impossible. If you're okay with that and want to give it a go anyway I'd say your only hope is to ramp mileage AND intensity right now. This is the opposite of what I'd normally say but yours is an extreme case. So run at least 35 mpw including a long run of about 12 with a fast finish and a mid week workout of 6 x 800m at current 5k pace with 400m recovery jogs. If you hold together you'll probably see some significant improvement over your last 5k. I sure can't promise 2 minutes though. Good luck.
The Thunder takes peer pressure and steps on it's balls.
--The Thunder, 7-29-2010
PowerOfQ
Voice of Summer
posted: 5/31/2008 at 6:28 PM
Mike, can you define "fast finish" relative to Len's need for a faster 5k? Do you mean for him to hit it on the last mile, or open it up from farther out than that even?
Good luck Len! I have no advice for you, but will prolly log-stalk ya to see how it's going. Maybe you should make a wager w/yourself where if you don't hit 21 flat you've gotta take another shot of the stun gun. That'd make it more interesting for everyone!
Baseball is a lot like life. It's a day-to-day existence, full of ups and downs. You make the most of your opportunities in baseball as you do in life. - Ernie Harwell (1918 - 2010)
mikeymike
Laser show. Relax.
posted: 5/31/2008 at 6:54 PM
Quote from PowerOfQ on 5/31/2008 at 6:28 PM:
Mike, can you define "fast finish" relative to Len's need for a faster 5k? Do you mean for him to hit it on the last mile, or open it up from farther out than that even?
I would say pick it up for the last 2-4 miles. It doesn't have to be any exact pace or anything specific. I just mean run easy for the first 3/4 or so and then start to open it up a bit. Kind of a "smell the barn" tempo.
The Thunder takes peer pressure and steps on it's balls.
--The Thunder, 7-29-2010
Ileneforward
posted: 5/31/2008 at 10:26 PM
modified: 5/31/2008 at 10:26 PM
{{>>magic speedy vibes>>
Len
<
shop.cafepress.com/dornbusch
Runners are crazy. They wear short shorts and skirts. They strap Casio calculators to their damn wrists and wrap plastic and elastic around their chests. They put a bunch of lube on random parts of their bodies. They run until someone tells them it's over and then they ask for beer. Let's face it, runners are a bunch of nutjobs. ~ willamona
Marcus L S
The Greatest of All Time
posted: 5/31/2008 at 10:39 PM
modified: 5/31/2008 at 10:39 PM
Quote from mikeymike on 5/31/2008 at 6:03 PM:
Wow if you're playing "stump the swamp" I think you might have won.
I thought the same thing.
I only slightly disagree with Mikey on a small point. I think you need to run your 800's quicker than
current
5k pace. I would run them at
target or goal
5k pace or even a little bit faster.
Your last 5k was 22:55, 7:24 per mile, 3:41 800's. I personally don't think running 800's on 3:41 is going to make you much faster. You need to get used to running at your goal pace or faster.
Your goal 5k time is 20:55, that equates to 6:45 per mile pace. That puts your 800's at 3:22, which is how fast I would run them or maybe a little bit faster.
I have always ran 400's, 800's, etc faster than 5k pace. For example, if my 5k pace is 6:00, that's 3:00 for an 800, or 1:30 per 400. But in an interval workout I would likely run my 800's at 5:45 pace (2:52) and my 400's a little faster at like 5:35 pace (1:24).
Holding exact pace can be tricky. You might need to look at your watch every 200m. So however fast you decide to run them, do the math ahead of time so you know where you need to be as you progress through the work interval. It sucks when you finish the work interval and you either went too fast (and thus might not be able to do the entire workout at the planned pace) or you did it too slow.
A work around to this is to do it on a treadmill.
While it is true you must run longer to run faster, you must also train faster (some times) to race faster. And given your time crunch and ambitious goal, you're going to need to be aggressive.
all you touch and all you see, is all your life will ever be
Obesity is a disease. Yes, a disease where nothing tastes bad...except salads.
mikeymike
Laser show. Relax.
posted: 6/1/2008 at 12:12 AM
modified: 6/1/2008 at 12:21 AM
I totally disagree that you need to train at goal pace to race at goal pace. And I've proven it many times over in my own running.
You can only improve so fast or in other words respond to so much stimulus. If you're amping mileage and doing one workout a week at current 5k pace you'll be doing about as much as you can. If current 5k pace is too easy then you're better off increasing the volume or shorten the recovery. You don't get used to a pace, you get used to an intensity level. As you get fitter, the same intensity produces faster paces. In fact a lot of times when people run their best races their perception is that it felt easy--I've certainly had that experience.
I know the whole train at goal pace is conventional wisdom but I think it's a mistake most runners make.
mta: Having said all of that, your 5k pace is going to be a moving target (hopefully) and you're not going to be racing often enough to know what it is all the time. So if you do the workout one week at current pace, then you go back and do it in a week or two at what feels like the same intensity and it comes out faster, that's fine. That's what you want actually--to have the same workout feel the same or easier but get faster.
The Thunder takes peer pressure and steps on it's balls.
--The Thunder, 7-29-2010
Marcus L S
The Greatest of All Time
posted: 6/1/2008 at 12:43 AM
modified: 6/1/2008 at 12:51 AM
Quote from mikeymike on 6/1/2008 at 12:12 AM:
I know the whole train at goal pace is conventional wisdom but I think it's a mistake most runners make.
It was my suggestion that he train at goal race pace in this case due to the short amount of time he has to try to chip off 2 minutes of a 5k, which is a lofty goal.
I think he needs to feel that speed and the intensity it requires to achieve that pace. His goal is over 30 seconds faster than his 5k PR. He does not have a huge base and very little speed work.
My training paces are always based on current or recent race times, not goal paces. In fact I didn't even know it was conventional wisdom until I read what you wrote. FWIW, Daniels uses current or recent race times in calculating training paces. In my case, goals are set off of current fitness anyway. If you're in tune to how you're training you should be able to predict pretty accurately how you will race. All things being equal, those pace calculators and race time estimators are scary accurate. I have never attempted what he is trying to do. I don't know if it's even possible.
I may not have correctly articulated my thoughts or I may be incorrect.
But chopping almost 45 seconds per mile off of 5k pace in one month requires a change in process IMO. I
agree he needs to increase volume too.
Quote from mikeymike on 6/1/2008 at 12:12 AM:
So if you do the workout one week at current pace, then you go back and do it in a week or two at what feels like the same intensity and it comes out faster, that's fine. That's what you want actually--to have the same workout feel the same or easier but get faster.
Exactly. That was what I was trying to explain.
MTA: No matter what I still believe you run 400's, 800's, etc faster than current 5k pace as I outlined above. In other words, if current 5k pace is 6:00, I would run 800's faster than 3:00. But as far as I am concerned this is not the same as a
goal
pace.
all you touch and all you see, is all your life will ever be
Obesity is a disease. Yes, a disease where nothing tastes bad...except salads.
willamona
Hawt and sexy
posted: 6/1/2008 at 3:49 AM
A 5k is really too short for me, I just don't have the speed for them and don't know how to train for them really. The Yasso 800 thing made me giggle though, if that counts for anything.
In all honesty though, I took time off of my 5k by simply running more mpw over about 4 months. I bet if I ran another 5k now, I would be faster than I was last August, but even I would be surprised if I took off two minutes in that amount of time. Yasso ain't THAT good. Speedwork means nothing if you don't have the base work in to support it.
Ok, I guess I should have just said run more, sorry.
Running is like sex; the more you do the more you want.
mikeymike
Laser show. Relax.
posted: 6/1/2008 at 12:21 PM
Those aren't Yassos.
The Thunder takes peer pressure and steps on it's balls.
--The Thunder, 7-29-2010
Len
Damn Yankee
posted: 6/1/2008 at 5:01 PM
Thanks for the input. I can live with the fact that it may be impossible for me to reach my goal, but it won't be for the lack of effort.
I like your plan Mike. I think it will give me the best chance of success, a 5k PR at the minimum.
Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending. Carl Bard
corland
posted: 6/1/2008 at 8:59 PM
I was glancing through Noakes the other day looking for something completely unrelated. I remember seeing a graph though, that indicated one needs about 6 weeks of sharpening to peak. I think that if you hold up through mikeymike's mini schedule you'll be close to your best.
I was amazed at how much pace 6-8 weeks of sharpening added to my race times this year. I'll give you a vote of confidence and tell you that I think it's possible. Good Luck
Len
Damn Yankee
posted: 6/1/2008 at 10:42 PM
Thanks Corland. I want the mug. It's stupid, but it's a goal that is so tantalizing I can taste it. Just barely out of reach, but there it is waiting for me to grasp it.
Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending. Carl Bard
willamona
Hawt and sexy
posted: 6/2/2008 at 1:58 AM
I'm pretty much going to call any 800 repeat workout Yasso's, especially when I am half tweaked. Jack Daniels came over last night and we had a long talk.
Running is like sex; the more you do the more you want.
corland
posted: 6/2/2008 at 4:53 AM
Quote from Len on 6/1/2008 at 10:42 PM:
it's a goal that is so tantalizing I can taste it. Just barely out of reach, but there it is waiting for me to grasp it.
I want a goal like that.
1
2
3
4
5
6
User Groups
>
2000 miles of being part of the fauna
>
Forum
>
How realistic is this goal? For real.
Feedback
|
Help
© 2010 RunningAHEAD.com. All rights reserved.