I have run in Lunarglides for pretty much all my running career. Was at LRS getting some compression sleeves and saw they had Lunar eclipses. I googled weight and know they are 2oz heavier. I have been dealing with leg pain and after a stent on the TM I think the pounding on the pavement is wearing me down. Anyone try each of these shoes and have any input
I run in Nike Lunarglides but I am hardly a wealth of knowledge because I have never run in anything else so I have no basis of comparison.
5K (6 total) PR: 28:16 (5/5/13) 10K (2 total) PR: 1:05:02 (5/19/13) 4M (2 total) PR:44:46 (4/7/13) [yet to "race" one of these all-out] HM TBD 10/12/13
Capitol Hill Classic 10K 5/19/13
Baltimore 10 Miler 6/15/13
NY Giants Run of Champions 5K 6/23/13
Goal Race of 2013:
Baltimore Half Marathon 10/12/13
sorry, I didn't notice I just put Lunars, I as well do the glides but was told eclipse has more cushion. I tried Asics gels and although I liked the cushion I disliked the extra weight.
PRs: Marathon (2:56xx; '13) Half (1:25xx; '12) 10k (40:26; '11) 5mi (29:23; '13) 5k (18:31; '11)
I was under the impression that the LunarEclipse have more support features than the Glides as well.
I pronate pretty significantly and I wore a pair of them for a while. They certainly didn't last as many miles as my Adrenalines, perhaps because they were borderline supportive enough to start with, but if I can run in them without a problem, they have a decent amount of support.
My wildly inconsistent PRs:
5k: 24:36 (10/20/12)
10k: 52:01 (4/28/12)
HM: 1:50:09 (10/27/12)
Marathon: 4:19:11 (10/2/2011)
© 2013 RunningAHEAD, LLC. All rights reserved.