Beginners and Beyond

12

How important is aerobic/anerobic threshold training?? (Read 113 times)

MrNamtor


    So I just ran my longest distance race which was a half. And also I think this is the first race that i really ran hard. Looking back, I think that in my (few) prior races i was too cautious and left time on the course.

     

    Anyway, while running this race, I felt a lot of aerobic stress, more than in any of my training runs (even the speed work). And I was actually uncomfortable with this feeling! And I realized that most of my training is anaerobic and that I very rarely if ever push myself to that level of aerobic stress in my training, and if i do, it's never for more than a minute or 2.

     

    During and after the race I wondered if i could have done better if I'd focused more on  threshold training before the race (And I'm talking about this specifically, not just speedwork in general).

     

    So my question to everyone is how important is it, in your opinion  to train specifically in this way? Because i look at some people's logs and they are pretty fast, yet all they seem to do is easy runs (and yes, those "easy" runs are at a pace I would consider fast, but I'm assuming they are not aerobically challenging for these folks).


    Hip Redux

      What do you mean by your training is anaerobic?  Typically, that's things like sprint work, VO2 max, etc.     It sounds like you're saying the opposite, but I wasn't sure what you meant.

       

      MrNamtor


        I may be transposing the meaning of anaerobic  and aerobic. And i was a bio major for a year!

         

        Yeah, i mean the opposite. I mean I rarely am fighting for breath or feeling my heart pound

         

        Edit:So I looked it up and it seems that I'm probably misusing a bunch of terms. I guess to answer this question just ignore everything i say about my own training and just answer the question i seem to be asking. Big grin

          Taking a look at your log, the thing I noticed was a lot of very short runs - less than 30 min. Not sure if this was to fit into a tight schedule or ...  I believe Pam Reed was known for running many runs in one day - whatever she could fit between rest of life obligations - but I think she had a bit of an aerobic base anyway. Many people take at least 10 min to warm up. Sometimes 1.5 hr runs are suggested as having benefits beyond something shorter (can't remember the authors). If you're defining tempo the way many people do - a warmup, then 20 min a bit easier than LT or 1-hr race effort - you've got plenty of higher effort stuff. (I've seen suggestions that higher effort stuff might be on order of 5-10% of recreational runner's volume, at most.) But you might be using "tempo" in a different sense.

           

          I'd say you're lacking the aerobic duration base. There's no way for a viewer to tell the actual intensity of your runs since they are spread across an assortment of surfaces and no indication of hilliness, so not really sure.

           

          Races are supposed to hurt. HM won't hurt in the same way a 5k does, but you should be breathing hard. If you have a large aerobic base, you won't have to breathe as hard for the same pace (on same surface).

           

           

          PS: Last two posts appeared while I was writing this. I don't think that changes my conclusion. But it may mean that my conclusion agrees with yours rather than being different. Wink

          "So many people get stuck in the routine of life that their dreams waste away. This is about living the dream." - Cave Dog
          Love the Half


            Bear with me.  Let's start with the aerobic/anaerobic thing.

             

            When you move your body, the energy to do so will come from either aerobic or anaerobic pathways.  Anaerobic means "without oxygen" so it seems nearly self-evident that your muscles can't exercise without oxygen for very long.  Still, they can for a while because survival may require quick, intense bursts of activity and your body doesn't know it's not trying to survive out on the African savanna 30,000 years ago.  When you think about running, go out and run a 40 yard dash as hard as you can.  I mean an all out, everything you have in you sprint.  If you do that, nearly all of your energy will come from anaerobic pathways.  At the other end of the spectrum, go run a marathon as hard as you can.  With the possible exception of putting on a feeble sprint in the last 100 yards, nearly all of your energy will come from aerobic pathways.  If a 40 yard dash uses anaerobic pathways almost exclusively, and a marathon uses aerobic pathways almost exclusively, the implication is that, at some point, your energy will come roughly 50% from aerobic and 50% from anaerobic pathways.  It turns out that around two minutes is that magic point.  So, if you go out and run for two minutes as hard as you can, roughly half of your energy will come from anaerobic pathways and half from aerobic pathways.

             

            That's aerobic and anaerobic.  Unfortunately, bad terminology has stuck around.  What people refer to as the "anaerobic threshold" is really the "lactate turnpoint."  When you exercise aerobically, and lactate is an aerobic product, your body generates lactate.  The old "lactic acid" used to be blamed for all kinds of woes including DOMS.  It turns out that lactate is crucial to the aerobic energy cycle.  As exercise intensity increases, both your production and your consumption of lactate increases.  At some point though, as you continue to increase the intensity of your exercise, you will produce more lactate than you consume.  This is the "lactate turnpoint."  It used to be thought that your lactate production kept increasing past the lactate turnpoint but newer evidence seems to suggest that your ability to use lactate as a fuel decreases as your intensity reaches a certain point.  Regardless, past that level of intensity, lactate will begin to accumulate in your body fairly rapidly.  You experience this as the muscular burn and fatigue in those shorter races.  Here is why you should care.

             

            You have a maximum ability to use oxygen.  That's your VO2max.  An average adult might have a VO2max of around 40.  An elite athlete may have a VO2max in excess of 80.  Although I haven't had mine measured, it's probably about 50.  You can improve your VO2max through training but there is some evidence that it doesn't really improve much after the first couple of years.  You also have a velocity VO2max.  At some point, as you speed up, you will hit your VO2max.  That's not your maximum speed.  It's just that you won't use more oxygen than that even if you do speed up.  So, let's call that your vVO2max.

             

            Your lactate turnpoint will be some percentage of your vVO2max regardless of whether you are a couch potato or a world class endurance athlete.  However, one of the major differences between professional endurance athletes and recreational runners and couch potatoes is that percentage.  A professional may have a lactate turnpoint somewhere in the neighborhood of 85% of his/her vVO2max.  That's why Ryan Hall's marathon pace is only 30-40 seconds per mile slower than his 5K pace while mine is more like 60-70 seconds slower.  Rather than a lactate turnpoint 85% of vVO2max, my lactate turnpoint is probably more like 70% of vVO2max.  A couch potato really struggles.  His lactate turnpoint may be under 50% of his vVO2max.

             

            Remember the couple of years to max your VO2max?  Well, you can continue working on your lactate turnpoint for 5-8 years.  In other words, you can continue moving your lactate turnpoint closer to your vVO2max.  So, while your VO2max may not be improving, you can improve your resistance to fatigue and you can run faster.  How do you improve your lacate turnpoint?  The simple answer is tempo runs.

             

            You will frequently hear of the "lactate threshold" pace as the pace at which you could race for about an hour.  For very, very good runners, this is about half marathon distance.  For probably the majority of recreational runners, this is more like 10K or 12K.  What you want to do is to stress your body's ability to burn lactate without going over the edge.  This means those hard tempo runs lasting 20-40 minutes.  There are a nearly infinite variety of tempo runs and cruise intervals.  Cruise intervals involve running 1-2 mile intervals at tempo pace with 1-2 minute breaks.  I use them early in a training cycle to work on my lactate turnpoint without putting a lot of stress on my body.  You don't really want to do tempo runs in excess of 40 minutes because then you're putting race level stress on your body.  Remember that a tempo run is the pace at which you could race for an hour and you don't normally want to race in training.  The idea is to exercise at an intensity that is just barely below your lactate turnpoint.  You can get this measured in a lab but that "comfortably hard" pace for 30 minutes ends up being damned accurate.  Or, you can use my guideline which is that I like to finish a tempo run thinking I could have run 1 more mile at that level of effort if my life depended on it but I'm very, very glad I don't have to do so.  (You can also do silly things like plugging in a recent race time into a VDOT calculator if you want to get all technical and stuff.  If you haven't visited that site, I highly recommend it).

             

            Link to VDOT Calculator.

             

            Don't get me wrong.  There is an important place for 60-90 minute hard runs in your training program but those are marathon pace runs and you use them to build resistance to fatigue and mental strength rather than using them to increase your lactate turnpoint.

            Short term goal: 17:59 5K

            Mid term goal:  2:54:59 marathon

            Long term goal: To say I've been a runner half my life.  (I started running at age 45).

               

              Edit:So I looked it up and it seems that I'm probably misusing a bunch of terms. I guess to answer this question just ignore everything i say about my own training and just answer the question i seem to be asking. Big grin

               

              Living in Chicago, sounds like you are paraphrasing the late Mayor Richard J. Daley (the father), who would admonish reporters to "write what I mean, not what I say".

              Dave

              MJ5


              Chief Unicorn Officer

                I agree with LTH's explanations and more importantly the things he said about tempo runs. Many people hate them (myself included) but they are SO crucial to improvement. I have discussed them with other guys that are in my running club and we also agree with the time frame for running tempos--usually 20-40 minutes. I usually stay more around 20 minutes.

                 

                Also 30 minute runs don't give you much of an aerobic base. (Disclaimer: I have not actually looked at your log, this is based on a previous post). In my base phase, which was 12 weeks, I would do runs of 1.5 hours twice a week, and a long run of 2 hours once per week, and fill in three other days of running. The difference in that and previous years was very noticeable as far as my aerobic fitness felt.

                Mile 5:49 - 5K 19:58 - 10K 43:06 - HM 1:36:54

                So_Im_a_Runner


                Go figure

                  So my question to everyone is how important is it, in your opinion  to train specifically in this way? Because i look at some people's logs and they are pretty fast, yet all they seem to do is easy runs (and yes, those "easy" runs are at a pace I would consider fast, but I'm assuming they are not aerobically challenging for these folks).

                   

                  Since LTH pretty well nailed the original portion of the question, I'll dive into this little section.  For starters, you are definitely still at the point that you'll continue to get faster just by accumulating mileage (as am I).  The sweet thing is, this works in two ways:  you benefit from just total cumulative mileage over time, and from actual increases in your miles per week.

                   

                  With that being said, you can definitely see even bigger gains by incorporating speed work into your running program.  I'm not sure which logs you checked out, but I'm guessing I run most of my runs slower than most people that have race times similar to mine.  That's partly just about knowing what works and keeps one healthy on an individual basis.  For me, I know that I can handle volume without much trouble but I have to be careful with speed.  Even with that in mind, I still do 2 to 3 hard workouts in any given week of marathon training.

                   

                  Also, it could just be an illusion because not everyone logs their runs the same way on here.  I don't upload mine directly to the site, so the splits don't show up.  Therefore, all you see is my total logged run, which is just an average pace for the entire workout that includes recovery jogs and easy miles.  To illustrate, here's an example of a threshold session for me during marathon training:

                   

                  3 mile easy

                  2x10min@hmp to 10k pace (6:00-6:26 for me) w/2min active recovery

                  3 mile easy

                   

                  If you were to look for that it my log, you'd see that I probably averaged about 7:30m/m for that whole workout, even though the workout did include faster running.

                   

                  Just as one other aside, I think it's crucial to keep building on your threshold type workouts throughout a cycle.  I might start with those 2x10 min at HMP-10k pace one week, then the following I'd push that to 3x10min, and then a few weeks later I'd come back to it and do 4x10min.

                  Trying to find some more hay to restock the barn


                  Resident Historian

                    LTH explanation - 

                     

                    Most, 80%+, of your training should be aerobic - as LTH defines it.  But if you can run ~10% of weekly miles near that lactate threshold/turnpoint, it's critical to build endurance at speed, and to drive the LT point to a faster speed.   An even smaller portion of miles at sub-10K or sub-5k speed is more than enough to deal with VO2Max improvement and sustain it.  However, the biggest benefit of the fastest paces can be to allow the body to find it's most efficient running form.   Even experienced runners can make gains

                     

                    Run a lot.  Mostly easy, a small portion fast.

                     

                    And +1 to comments that 2 30 minute runs don't help as much as a single 1-hour run.

                    Neil

                    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    “Some people will tell you that slow is good – but I'm here to tell you that fast is better. I've always believed this, in spite of the trouble it's caused me. - Hunter S. Thompson

                    Love the Half


                      That's almost like my running haiku:

                       

                      Run some runs harder

                      Between hard runs, run easy

                      Rest.  Then run again.

                       

                      Run a lot.  Mostly easy, a small portion fast.

                        

                      Short term goal: 17:59 5K

                      Mid term goal:  2:54:59 marathon

                      Long term goal: To say I've been a runner half my life.  (I started running at age 45).

                      MrNamtor


                        ok wow. I'm going to read all this after dinner. Thanks guys!!

                        Brrrrrrr


                        Uffda

                          I think tomorrow morning is going to be a tempo run. Smile I've been doing my GHMP for this training cycle instead of tempo runs.

                          - Andrew


                          Resident Historian

                            Yours is much more... poetic!  Well done.

                             

                            That's almost like my running haiku:

                             

                            Run some runs harder

                            Between hard runs, run easy

                            Rest.  Then run again.

                            Neil

                            --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            “Some people will tell you that slow is good – but I'm here to tell you that fast is better. I've always believed this, in spite of the trouble it's caused me. - Hunter S. Thompson


                            Will run for scenery.

                              Great thread. I loved LTH's post. All the biochemical stuff is still pretty elusive to me, but one (simple) thing I have heard which always rings true is the value of running on tired legs. You get warmed up, you run long enough to get over the novelty of it, you run until you feel that there's only so much in left inside you, then you run more/harder. In that state, your body REALLY pays attention to what is efficient. If the tiniest little tweak to form/pace/stride gives a 0.1% advantage, you body takes notice and remembers. I don't run fast at all (yet) but I do a lot of uphill. And the biggest help I've found is running uphill when I'm totally spent. Usually what happens is that I want to slow down and give in. But if some miniscule adjustment makes it easy to speed up, it's like I just won bigtime at Vegas : flashing lights, confetti, money shooting at me too fast to count, and unspeakably hot women sidling up and saying "ooh, baby ! you do that so good!" IOW, something deep inside you takes notice and remembers.

                               

                              I think this happens whenever you push yourself to run farther OR faster on tired legs. But the big point, for me, is not just clocking miles. That is step #1. Pushing harder is step #2.

                              Stupid feet!

                              Stupid elbow!

                              MrNamtor


                                Great thread. I loved LTH's post. All the biochemical stuff is still pretty elusive to me, but one (simple) thing I have heard which always rings true is the value of running on tired legs. You get warmed up, you run long enough to get over the novelty of it, you run until you feel that there's only so much in left inside you, then you run more/harder. In that state, your body REALLY pays attention to what is efficient. If the tiniest little tweak to form/pace/stride gives a 0.1% advantage, you body takes notice and remembers. I don't run fast at all (yet) but I do a lot of uphill. And the biggest help I've found is running uphill when I'm totally spent. Usually what happens is that I want to slow down and give in. But if some miniscule adjustment makes it easy to speed up, it's like I just won bigtime at Vegas : flashing lights, confetti, money shooting at me too fast to count, and unspeakably hot women sidling up and saying "ooh, baby ! you do that so good!" IOW, something deep inside you takes notice and remembers.

                                 

                                I think this happens whenever you push yourself to run farther OR faster on tired legs. But the big point, for me, is not just clocking miles. That is step #1. Pushing harder is step #2.

                                This is a great thread, and I haven't even had time to read it yet!

                                 

                                I would though, like to take the opportunity to say something now that I've said before but i feel like repeating.

                                 

                                One thing that I really miss about the old RW, although i wasn't there long, was the really and truly magical synergy between Brad, SRL, Mike, and George. I know that MJ5 is knowledgeable, and that Lily and Damaris have a lot of wisdom and that we have great and even an elite runner or two amongst us. So I do not mean to omit anyone in this statement.


                                But we had LTH, SRL, Moth and wcrunner, and these 4 guys are so different and come from completely different places. And the reasons they run are different. And the reasons they are great are different. And their attitudes towards running are all different.

                                 

                                I may be wrong but i don't think these guys like each other or ever did, and the rest of us have opinions about each of these guys as well that may or may not be purely positive.  But nevertheless, the threads that would come out of the discussions/disagreements or whatever were, in my opinion, priceless.

                                 

                                I wish that hadn't disintegrated.  But nothing lasts forever and you can't, as John Lennon said of the Beatles, rebake a souffle. And so it goes.

                                 

                                Just some thoughts. I'm going to read these comments and reply/ask follow up questions tomorrow.

                                 

                                Anyway, carry on all Big grin

                                12