Low HR Training

Which HRMs do you like? (Read 1256 times)


Wasatch Speedgoat

posted: 7/1/2009 at 8:25 PM

Polar FS3 mostly and occasionally I use my Polar transmitter with my Suunto HR monitor, which i mainly have for the altitude. I have also used a Timex in the past and I have found that the transmitters that have a replaceable battery, leaks in sweat and shorts out. Nothing like the sealed Polar transmitter that lasts for 7 years.

 

Steve

 

PS: I've also just poked my head in here from time to time, very busy at work and at getting the house ready to sell. I do read many of the posts, this forum is great. It has grown immensely from what I started back a couple of  years ago. As for the history of the group, when all the Coolrunning folk moved over her, I handed the reigns to Jesse, the Coolrunning moderator.

Life is short, play hard!
posted: 7/6/2009 at 10:09 AM
Garmin 405 for me.
I especially like that I can upload HR and track data directly to my runningahead.com running log.
you log 16 miles, and whadda ya get?
another day older in oxygen debt..
heart meter don't ya call me cuz i can't go...
i owe my soles to the running shoe stooooore
Docster


posted: 7/6/2009 at 1:21 PM

First off, thank you for everything you have given to the running/endurance community, Dr. Phil. Your advice has been paramount in the "success" I have had since getting my butt off the couch a few years back. (also huge thanks to Jesse, Jimmy, and others!)

 

My wife and I both use Garmin 305's. For biking, we use the Garmin 305 Edge and I recently purchased a 705 Edge. (all use the same HR/GPS technology, which is great since I can sync. my HR strap to multiple devices)

 

If someone just wanted a HR monitor, though, I would pass on the Garmin. For runner's, though, it has the ability to take the HR data and correspond it to a specific course/run which you can use as a baseline, etc.

 

TJR


posted: 7/6/2009 at 2:34 PM
I have a HRMs from Polar (FS1, and RS800) Garmin (305 and 405) and Suunto (T1 and T6) and hands-down I prefer the Suunto T6.  It works great, the user interface is easy to use.  I don't wear my glasses while running and have no trouble reading the display.
posted: 7/8/2009 at 3:36 PM
modified: 7/8/2009 at 3:52 PM

Hi Phil!  Garmin 305 here--does everything I need. 

 

(sorry to the forum members that I've been out of touch--not much time these days which is why I need to do things like wake up this morning at 3 AM to run 17 miles before work.  I pulled off a 19 minute marathon PR in April on very low training mileage--hoping for at least 9 less minutes this fall at a race TBD that will Boston Qualify me).

 

(P.S. I was able to average a 184 heart rate in my last marathon.  I think that is about the best I can do--maybe 1-2 beats more at most)

TexasRunner


posted: 12/29/2009 at 4:55 AM

I use a cardiosport GT3 and I have a cardiosport Extreme (a spring fell out while changing battery so not sure how well it works right now).

 

I like cardiosport because you can change the battery in the transmitter yourself.

posted: 12/30/2009 at 6:53 AM
modified: 12/30/2009 at 6:55 AM

Saw this topic resurrected so I'll add one in case it's still useful to anyone:

 

"Kinetic" HR monitor and watch

Gives the basics along with a chrono (no splits)

$20 at Publix grocery stores - I don't know about online

 

I've had mine for about 3 months, use it several times a week and it seems to be fairly accurate - they're so cheap I should buy a couple more...My only complaint is that the wristband is pretty rigid -  but still comfortable.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goal HM under 2:00:00
DrPhil


posted: 1/13/2010 at 2:54 PM
Quote from havanarnr on 12/30/2009 at 6:53 AM:

Saw this topic resurrected so I'll add one in case it's still useful to anyone:

 

"Kinetic" HR monitor and watch

Gives the basics along with a chrono (no splits)

$20 at Publix grocery stores - I don't know about online

 

I've had mine for about 3 months, use it several times a week and it seems to be fairly accurate - they're so cheap I should buy a couple more...My only complaint is that the wristband is pretty rigid -  but still comfortable.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is nice to know about -- an inexpensive alternative to the overpriced monitors out there. Might be a nice addition to the book. Where is this made?

 

Has anyone tried the new ithlete technology, used with a heart monitor to measure resting heart rate and heart rate variatbility? The technology is so far only available in the iphone and the touch screen ipod.

 

Phil

jimmyb


posted: 1/13/2010 at 7:18 PM

I use this one as a backup:

 

 


Triathlete or Runner?

posted: 1/13/2010 at 8:54 PM
Nice one Jimmy. I just got the new garmin HRM, which is a huge upgrade from the previous version. A lot smaller and less bulky, pricey tho at 60ish but I think its worth it. Heck I don't spend my money on golfing and other sports.
posted: 1/14/2010 at 12:09 AM
modified: 1/14/2010 at 12:25 AM
Quote from DrPhil on 1/13/2010 at 2:54 PM:

This is nice to know about -- an inexpensive alternative to the overpriced monitors out there. Might be a nice addition to the book. Where is this made?

 

Has anyone tried the new ithlete technology, used with a heart monitor to measure resting heart rate and heart rate variatbility? The technology is so far only available in the iphone and the touch screen ipod.

 

Phil

 

 

Dr. Phil - I did a quick search but unfortunately wasn't able to find out much.  "Kinetek"  brand (I think I misspelled it in my post) HRMs are apparently made in Australia and sold primarily there and in the UK.  I was able to pick mine up at a Publix grocery store here in Fla. 3-4 months ago - apparently was a special deal they had with a supplier or the manufacturer.  I've seen a few "stray ones" on Ebay.uk, etc., but am unable to find a viable US website for domestic orders in my brief search... just these:

 

direct.tesco.com/q/N.1999325$3991647/Nr.99.95px   (scroll down) and

 

www.co-operative.coop/pharmacy/pharmacy-services/other-services/medical-electrical-products 

 

Re: ithlete technology, perhaps someone else will be able to help you with that. 

Goal HM under 2:00:00
posted: 2/24/2010 at 5:10 PM
really depends on your own personal preferences but... I like my RS200 (polar), and beyond measuring my HR correctly and consistently with the option to use a coded signal (!), it does everything that I *really* need i.e. have a real use for, including storing more than just 1 workout, storing way more than enough lap times, offering a customizable display and even though this one does not have the option for uploading graphs to the PC, I've yet to feel a need for that as I do most of my workouts in a constant low HR zone anyway. for races, I've yet to enter one but I guess I will just remember my heart rates as I'm good with numbers and am not a person with a need for visualization anyway. this is why I say it's up to you personally in terms of what kind of HRM will be best for you.
hmm, other than that do you need to know your pace and distance during the workout or are you happy with checking it out only afterwards? I'm the latter category but if you are the former, then you'll want a GPS, not a footpod, as a GPS has better accuracy independent of current pace, except maybe for altitude measurings.