Low HR Training

MAF test - back to using AGEmaf (Read 295 times)


Pond View

posted: 6/15/2009 at 2:02 PM
flower


Pretty Butterfly

QuoteModifyposted: 6/1/2009 at 10:17 AM
1st MAF test 1/27/2009 after running LHR for only a week or two: Outside on flat loop course, MAF131
Mile 1: 10:54/mile, AVG HR 129
Mile 2: 10:56/mile, AVG HR 129
Mile 3: 11:15/mile, AVG HR 130
Mile 4: 11:12mile, AVG HR 130

2nd MAF test 2/17/2009. Gym Treadmill, adjusted MAF126. 
m1, 12:15 miles/min, AVHR 122
m2, 12:30 mile/min, AVHR 125
m3, 12:50 mile/min, AVHR 125
m4, 13:25 mile/min, AVHR 125

3rd MAF test 3/09/2009. Gym Treadmill, MAF126.
m1, 12:05 miles/min, AVHR 124
m2, 12:22 miles/min, AVHR 124
m3, 12:52 miles/min, AVHR 124

4th MAF-test 4/29/2009, Outside Fl.Spr.Loop, adjusted MAF121.
m1, 13:05, AVHR 120

5/11/2009, Outside Fl Spr Loop, MAF121.
m1, 13:21, AVHR 120
m2,, 13:29, AVHR 121
m3, 13:39, AVHR 120
(m4, 13:09, AVHR 119) This mile was not performed on the same loop, I was running back home.

5/18/2009 Outside FL Spr Loop, MAF121.
m1, 12:28, AVHR 120
m2, 12:42, AVHR 120
m3, 12:51, AVHR 119
(m4, 12:54, AVHR 11Cool This mile was not performed on the same loop, I was running back home.

5/25/2009 Outside Fl Spr Loop, MAF121
m1, 13:14, AVHR 120
m2, 13:19, AVHR 120
m3, 13:36, AVHR 120
(m4, 13:54, AVHR 11Cool Not on loop, picking up water and shirt, running homeward.

6/1/2009 Outside Fl Spr Loop, MAF121 - 1/2mile splits
0.5m, 13:04, AHR 121
1.0m, 13:16, AHR121
1.5m, 13.18, AHR 121
2.0m, 13:23, AHR 122
2.5m, 14:03, AHR 121
3.0m, 14:10, AHR 121

________NEW BASELINE - MAF131___________

6/15/2009 Outside FL Spr Loop, MAF131
m1, 11:55, AHR 130
m2, 12:16, AHR 131
m3, 12:41, AHR 132
m4, 12:46, AHR 131
5K, 4/28/07 24:16 PR
10K, 5/5/07 49:23 PR
1/2 M, 12/08/07 1:49:34 PR
Marathon, 12/09/06 3:57:37 BQ
50K, 10/04/2009 7:27:00 PB


Richmond 2009

posted: 6/15/2009 at 4:11 PM
Those are some nice laps, flower.  I bet increasing the MAF by 10bpm made you feel like you were flying!
2010 Goals:
1. Run a lot
2. Mostly easy
3. Sometimes hard
4. Hopefully have it all add up to 1500+ miles of fun!


Pond View

posted: 6/15/2009 at 10:28 PM
Yapper - Thanks!
Not quite flying yet.....
I guess the most frustrating part is to look at my numbers from MAFtest1 back in January and compare. Oh well, my feet were completely destroyed back then so there's no need to revisit that "place". 
I'm happy with where I am with my running now.
5K, 4/28/07 24:16 PR
10K, 5/5/07 49:23 PR
1/2 M, 12/08/07 1:49:34 PR
Marathon, 12/09/06 3:57:37 BQ
50K, 10/04/2009 7:27:00 PB
jimmyb


posted: 6/15/2009 at 11:09 PM
modified: 6/15/2009 at 11:11 PM
Good luck at 131, Flower!

 

Your first test in January was done in 55º, partly cloudy-perfect weather. This latest  one was done in 70º and sunny, not so optimal. That 15º makes a big difference. I'm not sure of the humidity difference, but if today was higher that makes a bigger difference. You're not that far off.

 

--Jimmy


jimmyb


posted: 6/15/2009 at 11:19 PM
That difference can be up to 7% loss in performance over 50-55 weather, if you add high humidity, then even higher. The difference between your first and last test is around 10-11%


Richmond 2009

posted: 6/16/2009 at 1:37 AM
You know, Flower, I got to thinking about how it must feel to look at the first results and see the results now.  I'm sure that can be discouraging, but I do think the heat and humidity play a lot into it as Jimmy said.  I also just wanted to tell you how encouraging it has been for me to watch your journey.  You have experimented with different MAFs, paces, distances, times, etc in order to learn how your body responds, and that's pretty amazing.

I don't post a lot in here, and when I do there isn't much more than just data, but I wanted you to know that your MAFing has really inspired mine.  Thank you for that.
2010 Goals:
1. Run a lot
2. Mostly easy
3. Sometimes hard
4. Hopefully have it all add up to 1500+ miles of fun!


Pond View

posted: 6/16/2009 at 1:26 PM
Yapper, I am glad to know that you've been inspired by all the things I've posted - it's been great to share with you and everyone else; I learn in equal measure from you guys - it's a mutual give and take and I enjoy posting about my "journey" as you called it - writing about it makes me see more clearly what is going on. Reading what everyone else is doing is also inspiring - when you run by yourself it is great to be part of an online community. I am still experimenting and changing things around, so stay tuned for more!

Jimmy, you are the eternal optimist 
I appreciate you pointing out the positive aspects of this - I cannot always see it myself. I would like to see some improvement in the test but more importantly, I would like to get myself back in shape to do some races and to run a marathon before the end of the year. Now, maffing has become just one of many things I do with my running - not the main focus every day. It makes it easier to be relaxed about the test. 
Thanks anyway!

5K, 4/28/07 24:16 PR
10K, 5/5/07 49:23 PR
1/2 M, 12/08/07 1:49:34 PR
Marathon, 12/09/06 3:57:37 BQ
50K, 10/04/2009 7:27:00 PB
jimmyb


posted: 6/16/2009 at 2:41 PM
Quote from flower on 6/16/2009 at 1:26 PM:


Jimmy, you are the eternal optimist 
I appreciate you pointing out the positive aspects of this - I cannot always see it myself. I would like to see some improvement in the test but more importantly, I would like to get myself back in shape to do some races and to run a marathon before the end of the year. Now, maffing has become just one of many things I do with my running - not the main focus every day. It makes it easier to be relaxed about the test. 
Thanks anyway!

 

 I wasn't being optimistic, i was stating a fact about comparing performances. You can't put a performance done at 55º on the same playing field as one at 70º. There is a big difference between those two temperatures. An elite might not see a huge drop, but they will see one. Compare the top ten times at the Boston Marathon when the race is done at 70º and done in the 50's. Not even close. Amateurs like oursellves will see a much bigger drop. Whether you are doing MAF tests or LT runs or MRP runs, if you are wearing a HRM and using a particular zone, temp and humidity always is a factor in comparisons.

 

 --Jimmy


Pond View

posted: 7/8/2009 at 12:56 PM
1st MAF test 1/27/2009 after running LHR for only a week or two: Outside on flat loop course, MAF131
Mile 1: 10:54/mile, AVG HR 129
Mile 2: 10:56/mile, AVG HR 129
Mile 3: 11:15/mile, AVG HR 130
Mile 4: 11:12mile, AVG HR 130

2nd MAF test 2/17/2009. Gym Treadmill, adjusted MAF126. 
m1, 12:15 miles/min, AVHR 122
m2, 12:30 mile/min, AVHR 125
m3, 12:50 mile/min, AVHR 125
m4, 13:25 mile/min, AVHR 125

3rd MAF test 3/09/2009. Gym Treadmill, MAF126.
m1, 12:05 miles/min, AVHR 124
m2, 12:22 miles/min, AVHR 124
m3, 12:52 miles/min, AVHR 124

4th MAF-test 4/29/2009, Outside Fl.Spr.Loop, adjusted MAF121.
m1, 13:05, AVHR 120

5/11/2009, Outside Fl Spr Loop, MAF121.
m1, 13:21, AVHR 120
m2,, 13:29, AVHR 121
m3, 13:39, AVHR 120
(m4, 13:09, AVHR 119) This mile was not performed on the same loop, I was running back home.

5/18/2009 Outside FL Spr Loop, MAF121.
m1, 12:28, AVHR 120
m2, 12:42, AVHR 120
m3, 12:51, AVHR 119
(m4, 12:54, AVHR 11Cool This mile was not performed on the same loop, I was running back home.

5/25/2009 Outside Fl Spr Loop, MAF121
m1, 13:14, AVHR 120
m2, 13:19, AVHR 120
m3, 13:36, AVHR 120
(m4, 13:54, AVHR 11Cool Not on loop, picking up water and shirt, running homeward.

6/1/2009 Outside Fl Spr Loop, MAF121 - 1/2mile splits
0.5m, 13:04, AHR 121
1.0m, 13:16, AHR121
1.5m, 13.18, AHR 121
2.0m, 13:23, AHR 122
2.5m, 14:03, AHR 121
3.0m, 14:10, AHR 121

________NEW BASELINE - MAF131___________

6/15/2009 Outside FL Spr Loop, MAF131
m1, 11:55, AHR 130
m2, 12:16, AHR 131
m3, 12:41, AHR 132
m4, 12:46, AHR 131

7/8/2009 Outside Fl Spr Loop, MAF 131
m1, 11:54, AVHR 130
m2, 12:21, AVHR 132
m3, 12:44, AVHR 131
5K, 4/28/07 24:16 PR
10K, 5/5/07 49:23 PR
1/2 M, 12/08/07 1:49:34 PR
Marathon, 12/09/06 3:57:37 BQ
50K, 10/04/2009 7:27:00 PB
C-R


Aaack!

posted: 7/8/2009 at 1:18 PM

Flower - good to see some progression. I just read the thread and forgive me for hitting some of the other points albeit a bit late. Jimmy is (as usual) spot on regarding the change in outside conditions. Higher temps/humidity really kick the MAF results in the teeth. I am now totally a treadmill guy for MAF tests. I get a stable environment which can tell me more about my training and stress levels at that time. Well except the stuff on the tv monitor during the run

 

It looks like you are progressing in the training. I would recommend moving the MAF test infoors to remove the environmental aspect and reduce some variation. One thing we learned in research is that you need to be able to limit the number of movin variables to be able to validate results from sample ot sample.

 


"He conquers who endures" - Persius
"Life is tough. It's even tougher when you're stupid." - John Whayne New quote needed. Purdey found the secret

Running to Beat Cancer
jimmyb


posted: 7/8/2009 at 1:49 PM
modified: 7/8/2009 at 1:50 PM

Looks like a little regression, very little, pretty close, from the  6/15 test to the 7/8.

The temp on 6/15 was 70º and sunny. What about today?

 

--Jimmy


Pond View

posted: 7/8/2009 at 3:37 PM
Carmel and Jimmy - which way is it, progress or regress? Can you two agree on anything?! 
 
It looks like status quo to me - I can't use the high humidity and temps as an excuse every time! It was probably 75F, partly cloudy and extremely humid this morning. Felt suffocating out there. I warmed up for almost 2 miles prior to the test and felt fresh when I started but as I moved into the test I felt fatigue in legs and heavy sort of slow-mo slug type feeling. I'm not the best with keeping my spirits up during the tests - they depress the hell out of me, to say it mildly 

I wish I didn't care.

________________________________________

On a positive note I saw two hummingbirds in my feeder that we moved close to the kitchen windows last night. They are lovely. Also got to photograph a huge tiger swallowtail (butterfly) in my front yard lantana his morning. It hovered there for hours. I will try to post pics later.
5K, 4/28/07 24:16 PR
10K, 5/5/07 49:23 PR
1/2 M, 12/08/07 1:49:34 PR
Marathon, 12/09/06 3:57:37 BQ
50K, 10/04/2009 7:27:00 PB
jimmyb


posted: 7/8/2009 at 4:44 PM
Quote from flower on 7/8/2009 at 3:37 PM:
Carmel and Jimmy - which way is it, progress or regress? Can you two agree on anything?! 
 
It looks like status quo to me - I can't use the high humidity and temps as an excuse every time! It was probably 75F, partly cloudy and extremely humid this morning. Felt suffocating out there. I warmed up for almost 2 miles prior to the test and felt fresh when I started but as I moved into the test I felt fatigue in legs and heavy sort of slow-mo slug type feeling. I'm not the best with keeping my spirits up during the tests - they depress the hell out of me, to say it mildly 

I wish I didn't care.

 

It's okay to care. I care about my MAF tests. We can start a new forum together called "We Care About Our MAF Test Results" and only invite the intense. 

 

You HAVE to take temperature and humidity into account, Flower. The difference between 70º and 75º can be big (I have problems with 75º+ temps). When you add in high humidity, the difference can be huge. Even the pace of a run done at the same temperature, but one at low humidity, and one at high, can be starkly different at the same HR and fitness. I suggest that you keep track of temp, humidity, dewpoint, sun or overcast, and wind speed.

 

As you know, I've been reading all your posts (a big fan of the The Flower Show) and following your journey. You started out at 131 for an MAF, dropped to 126, then dropped to 121. You spent at least 3 months trying to wrap your mind around the rest and recovery concept and hard/easy days, and just how brief recovery runs should be. You started to get it around April and I saw progress in your MAY 18th test. That test was done at 121 and the pace was comparable to the tests done at 126. A little while after that you chose to drop lowHR training for Ishtvan's program, which seems to be a bit more anaerobic at times.

 

The initial 3 months or so, I don't think you were seeing much progress because of your hard/hard/hard/rest sort of scheduling. Once you switched to something less stressful, I saw some progress. The 121 might have been a little low for you as well. Not that you won't see progress at  180-age (-10)  and below, but  it MIGHT be slower progress for some. -5 might have been better.

 

Your current tests at 131 are somewhere between a plateau and a little progress when you take temp and humidity into account. Another test in a few weeks will give you a good idea on how your current program is working for you, and whether or not it is paying aerobic dividends.

 

If you decide to bring your tests indoors as Norm suggests, thne make sure you have a thermometer/hygrometer to measure temp/humidity. I have a cheap one that I keep near the treadmill. Also, make note of the outside humidity. I have noticed that on rainy, overcast days my TM paces will slow a little, even though the inside humidity hasn't risen that much. I like to do my tests on the TM at 1% incline.

 

Good luck, Flower. Don't let your tests get you down, use them to empower yourself and to modify and optimize your training. It's never the MAF test that let's you down, it's the training and the load that does.

 

Thanks for posting your results.

--Jimmy

 

C-R


Aaack!

posted: 7/8/2009 at 5:17 PM

Heh. Actually I was only looking at the 131 results and estimating based on temp and humidity differences. Using that small sample there is a slight progression assuming those impacts. Jimmy is more of the expert on the MAF test as I've only been at this for about a year and I agree with his other comments that there was little movement at the low MAF for you.

 

I just caught the -5 vs. -10 thought and that ties well into the question asked of Dr. Phil on the other thread. Hope he can help on that one as it will help lots of us on this board.

 

Keep posting the data and keep discussing. One thing I find is that I really need/enjoy learning from other's training and testing. Since I am a sample of one, I need more context and this all make a wonderful LHR/MAF stew.

 

Jimmy - one question on the indoor humidity and temp. I'm in an office buidling and it remains pretty constant. I know the guy who manages the EMS very very well. Some people even say that we look alike.  I don't find humidity fluctuations, even on rainy days, to be more than a couple of percentage points. Have you found this kind of granularity of effect on your tests?


"He conquers who endures" - Persius
"Life is tough. It's even tougher when you're stupid." - John Whayne New quote needed. Purdey found the secret

Running to Beat Cancer
jimmyb


posted: 7/8/2009 at 5:25 PM

Most of my TM runs ar done during winter when the heat is running. The TM was in the basement, and it would stay fairly cool , about 65º average. The humidity would fluctuate. High humidity outdoors did effect my pace a bit, even though the humidity stayed relatively low (but often it gets higher, but the gas heat would keep it dry). I would turn the heat down when beginning a run, and the humidity would go up a bit from the beginning to the end of the run.

AC I'm sure has a bit of a different effect as it will continually remove moisture from the air. How this will all play out in my new house, I don't know. The TM will be in a small room again.

 

--Jimmy