Low HR Training

Get the F out! (Read 1408 times)

lowgear1


Max McMaffelow Esq.

    Make that Calorie Czar, and i'm down with ya! lg, Duke of Earl
    ♪ ♫ Hey, hey, we're Maf Monkees And people say we monkey around. ♪ ♫ (The Monkees)
    Give me 12:59 in '09, please. I deserve it! (Maf of course)..No more teens! No more teens! (ME! ME! ME!)
    ♪ ♫ I Thank The Lord For The Night Time...And I Thank The Lord For You ♪ ♫ (Neil Diamond)
    lowgear1


    Max McMaffelow Esq.

      Page turner, sorry what the hell is lg talkin bout??/...didn't mean to butt in. This would be a good time to say "Let them eat cake", only I'm not sure what the heck that means. Don't think many people really do, much less care. Oh, well. lg, aka Earl of Sandwich by the bye..re "My Name is Earl"...seems to be "a good egg"
      ♪ ♫ Hey, hey, we're Maf Monkees And people say we monkey around. ♪ ♫ (The Monkees)
      Give me 12:59 in '09, please. I deserve it! (Maf of course)..No more teens! No more teens! (ME! ME! ME!)
      ♪ ♫ I Thank The Lord For The Night Time...And I Thank The Lord For You ♪ ♫ (Neil Diamond)
      GMoney


        Mark and Rudolf - Thanks for the links. Interesting reading. I always appreciate hearing different perspectives, so, again, thank you. George Beinhorn's book "Fitness Intuition" turned me on to "Eat to Live," but I wasn't familiar with McDougall, Mark. Do you find it hard limiting yourself to 3 fruits per day? I really enjoy fresh fruit. Rudolf, I take it you follow a living foods diet? It was good to see the information in your article reminding us of the importance of healthy fats. I love avocados and wouldn't want to follow an eating style that prohibits those. Mark, are avocados acceptable on your program? Right now, I'm trying to follow the style of eating promoted by Clarence Bass, which is remarkably similar to Dean Karnazes' style. (Of course, I'm talking about Karnos regular style. not the one featuring the large pizza, whole cheesecake, and pot of coffee on the road in the middle of the night. Evil grin) It's a style that's high in natural unprocessed foods and low in concentrated calories, yet not such a radical departure from a traditional way of eating that it would make life difficult for my family. A living food diet or the McDougall plan might be more effective, and I commend those who stick with them and succeed, but they honestly wouldn't work with my family life, right now. I'll report from time to time and let you know how I'm faring. If I don't progress then I may need, as Roy said in Blade Runner, "something a little more radical." I don't do well counting calories or percentages, but by tuning in to my body's signals, eating mostly high nutrient, low calorie foods (salmon is still a favorite of mine), eating only when I'm really hungry, and stopping when I've had enough, I think I'll make progress. (except for that bottle of Beaujolais Nouveau I shared with my wife last night - our November tradition.)
        Rudolf


          Thanks for the links. Interesting reading. I always appreciate hearing different perspectives, so, again, thank you. Rudolf, I take it you follow a living foods diet? It was good to see the information in your article reminding us of the importance of healthy fats. I love avocados and wouldn't want to follow an eating style that prohibits those. Mark, are avocados acceptable on your program?
          Hm I am not sure I actualy only read this article since it was linked on other forum. I was doing vegetarians style for years than not etc, but last 2-3 years I am around the style which is called raw - vegan, tried that to a letter but it did not suit me, at least not at this stage. I am more following EHRET system (nearly 100 years old - the system), so that means I am not raw, as I eat lots of water cooked (boiled or stewed vegetables) and also bread. However all fat is raw, never heated or burned and is hopefully all nonoxidized and nondamaged (chemicaly, heat, oxygen), so it is strictly no animal, no margarines, nop hydrogenated and old oils etc). I do not fit vegan label, although I do not eat anymore meat, dairy, fish or eggs, I do eat a lot of honey and some beepolen, This in a strict (to me nonlogical) vegan ideology is a big bno-no, so I invented for myself a label : HONEY-VEG. Lots of my food is live, fresh vegs, root as well as greens, plus the nonsweet fruits like tomatoes, capsicums, cucumbers etc, some sweet fruits - mainly berries, bananas , apples , oranges all fat is live, coconut fat-oils, avocados, cold pressed apricot kernel oils, wheat germ oil and such as well as raw nuts and seeds. Dean Karanazes is not my hero (mainly for the attitude of his promotion, so I do not know what he eats, but the story about his multilayered dairy biscuits made me sick). I prefer to follow or offer as a model Scott Jurek - he at least has some real performance results
          lowgear1


          Max McMaffelow Esq.

            Go Sooners!!!!!!!!!! Eat crow? Don't know.
            ♪ ♫ Hey, hey, we're Maf Monkees And people say we monkey around. ♪ ♫ (The Monkees)
            Give me 12:59 in '09, please. I deserve it! (Maf of course)..No more teens! No more teens! (ME! ME! ME!)
            ♪ ♫ I Thank The Lord For The Night Time...And I Thank The Lord For You ♪ ♫ (Neil Diamond)
            lowgear1


            Max McMaffelow Esq.

              Headline, Rio Linda Times: "Donald............Your Fired!" Asked about the Steinbrenner development, they responded "Weave continued to support the Steinbrenner's. It appears cricket to us." lg
              ♪ ♫ Hey, hey, we're Maf Monkees And people say we monkey around. ♪ ♫ (The Monkees)
              Give me 12:59 in '09, please. I deserve it! (Maf of course)..No more teens! No more teens! (ME! ME! ME!)
              ♪ ♫ I Thank The Lord For The Night Time...And I Thank The Lord For You ♪ ♫ (Neil Diamond)
                Mark. Do you find it hard limiting yourself to 3 fruits per day? I really enjoy fresh fruit. ... Mark, are avocados acceptable on your program? ... It's a style that's high in natural unprocessed foods and low in concentrated calories, yet not such a radical departure from a traditional way of eating that it would make life difficult for my family. A living food diet or the McDougall plan might be more effective, and I commend those who stick with them and succeed, but they honestly wouldn't work with my family life, right now. )
                Actually, I don't recall a limit on fruit in the McDougall program. Just shows how relaxed I am about following the rules. If he recommends a limit, I am guessing it is because of the fructose. I understand that the body treats fructose like fat and prefers to store it in adipose tissue straight away. My daily fruit consumption consists of a large glass of grape juice (Welsh's 100% Grape from frozen concentrate) and liberally spreading an "all fruit" jam on two or three slices of my whole wheat toast for breakfast. I usually have an apple or banana for snack or lunch. Don't usually have any for dinner unless I feel like treating myself. Then I will pour a bowl full of frozen wild blueberries and eat them like they were ice cream. I have had avacados in one of McDougall's recipes. He stresses not to go overboard with them due to the high fat content. Yes, you must be considerate of your family. My wife does not subscribe to McDougall herself. She doesn't like raw onions or any beans other than green beans. Both of those ingredients show up in many of McDougall's recipes. So she actually prepares two meals. Something for me and something else for her and our son, although they do eat my homemade bread. The stuff she makes for me has leftovers for a number meals. It was a tough sell getting my wife to prepare McDougall for me even when I pointed out the health benefits. She also took offense at the implication that what she had been feeding me was unhealthy. She demanded that I get more involved with the meal preparation and grocery shopping if that was the way I wanted to eat. The 12 day meal plan got us over the hump, but it certainly would be easier if we all ate the same thing.
                Thank you for your support,
                Mark
                GMoney


                  If he recommends a [fruit] limit, I am guessing it is because of the fructose. I understand that the body treats fructose like fat and prefers to store it in adipose tissue straight away. My daily fruit consumption consists of a large glass of grape juice (Welsh's 100% Grape from frozen concentrate) and liberally spreading an "all fruit" jam on two or three slices of my whole wheat toast for breakfast. I usually have an apple or banana for snack or lunch. Don't usually have any for dinner unless I feel like treating myself. Then I will pour a bowl full of frozen wild blueberries and eat them like they were ice cream.
                  Yep, that's it. He says "3 servings a day" for that reason (http://www.drmcdougall.com/free_4c.html). But I'd guess that if you're losing weight with the amount of fruit you are eating, then you're within your body's tolerance for the fructose. It's hard working out a diet with family, for sure. Sounds like you and your wife have gotten yourselves to a good zone of compromise now. I do most of the cooking in our house, but, mindful that I must only use my super powers for good, I try to center our meals around a dish the whole family can (and, hopefully, will) eat. Then I prepare separate side dishes for my (lacto-ovo vegetarian) wife, my children, and me. Often this means the centerpiece of the meal is a big salad, a vegetable soup, a tray of roasted vegetables, or whole wheat pasta with vegetables. I'll do a small side serving of salmon or lean grass fed beef for me, and a different small dish for my wife. If the kids don't like what the grown ups are eating, then there may be a third side dish, but it's really not that much cooking because the main focus of the meal is the same for all of us.
                  GMoney


                    One week in - 178 lbs, 20.7% fat per http://www.bblex.de/en/calc/navy.php (71" tall, 16.5 neck, 37.5 abdomen).
                    RER


                      OK, we all want to get faster, get more healthy, burn more fat and store less fat. It's one package. On the training side, it's why we're here in this Maffetone, Allen, et al. forum. Properly building an aerobic base means we've successfully programmed our bodies to burn more fat (relying less on glucose) for energy. When this happens, we start burning away body fat (as Maffetone says, not just during a run but all day and night). As our aerobic muscles work better, we're less injured and more healthy. And, as we burn more fat we have more energy for running, translating into running faster at the same heart rate (which then translates into better race times). Then there's the food we eat. This can work with or against what our training is doing for our metabolism. Yes, there's a difference between calories of fat and carbs and protein. If we want to burn more fat and reap the benefits noted above, we can't trash our metabolism with junk food -- specifically, eating things that reduce fat burning. The main foods that reduce fat burning are refined carbs, which seem to be the staple for many diets. Reducing or eliminating these foods, and replacing them with fruits, veggies, proteins, etc., can significantly increase fat burning even before we go out for our MAF run. So calories become more of an entertaining discussion, like BMI, scale weight and all the gadgets out there. Maffetone's waist-to-hips ratio is good, but even better is to just measure your waist once a month (and the math is easier Smile). For years I thought Maffetone's two week test was insane, but after seeing more and more runners in my lab get healthier and run faster from doing it, I started using it for overfat patients with real good success. There's no problem regarding muscle loss IF we're eating enough protein and continue running. Keeping things simple sometimes brings the best results. DavidD
                      GMoney


                        For years I thought Maffetone's two week test was insane, but after seeing more and more runners in my lab get healthier and run faster from doing it, I started using it for overfat patients with real good success...Keeping things simple sometimes brings the best results.
                        Thanks for the thoughtful message, David. Good reminder to keep it simple - in the running, on the plate, and in the body measurements. It's funny, Maffetone's "Two-Week Test" is remarkably close to Phase I of "The South Beach Diet." (Shows you what a catchy name and a multi-million dollar marketing campaign can do, I guess.) Agatston allows beans, insists on low fat dairy and meat, and has a strong preference for artificial sweeteners during his two weeks, but otherwise both two-week programs seem the same. I've done the two-week program several times and found it does help break some of the complaints Maffetone describes. I also lost weight, but wondered how much of that was water weight lost as my body accessed stored glycogen. Have you checked the overfat runners in your clinic to see whether they lose mostly fat or mostly water on the two-week plan? My biggest challenge with the two-week plan is transitioning fruit and concentrated carbs back into my diet too quickly. After two weeks I'm craving fresh fruit and something for breakfast besides eggs. It's my understanding that the latest versions of "South Beach" have a transition plan to gently bring back the carbs. Might be worth it for me to investigate. I think Thanksgiving weekend set me back.
                        GMoney


                          Week Two - 175.8, 18.9% (71 tall, 16.5 neck, 36.5 abdomen). Guess Thanksgiving didn't treat me badly.
                            OK, we all want to get faster, get more healthy, burn more fat and store less fat. It's one package. On the training side, it's why we're here in this Maffetone, Allen, et al. forum. Properly building an aerobic base means we've successfully programmed our bodies to burn more fat (relying less on glucose) for energy. When this happens, we start burning away body fat (as Maffetone says, not just during a run but all day and night). As our aerobic muscles work better, we're less injured and more healthy. And, as we burn more fat we have more energy for running, translating into running faster at the same heart rate (which then translates into better race times). Then there's the food we eat. This can work with or against what our training is doing for our metabolism. Yes, there's a difference between calories of fat and carbs and protein. If we want to burn more fat and reap the benefits noted above, we can't trash our metabolism with junk food -- specifically, eating things that reduce fat burning. The main foods that reduce fat burning are refined carbs, which seem to be the staple for many diets. Reducing or eliminating these foods, and replacing them with fruits, veggies, proteins, etc., can significantly increase fat burning even before we go out for our MAF run. So calories become more of an entertaining discussion, like BMI, scale weight and all the gadgets out there. Maffetone's waist-to-hips ratio is good, but even better is to just measure your waist once a month (and the math is easier Smile). For years I thought Maffetone's two week test was insane, but after seeing more and more runners in my lab get healthier and run faster from doing it, I started using it for overfat patients with real good success. There's no problem regarding muscle loss IF we're eating enough protein and continue running. Keeping things simple sometimes brings the best results. DavidD
                            David, If you don't mind me asking, what kind of lab do you work in. Are you a college professor? Research scientist? Both? If so...where? Have you had anything published? If you don't want to say, I understand.... just curious.
                            jimmyb


                              Dave, I keep meaning to suggest that you create a sticky, or add to an existing one, about what you have observed in your lab. What you've learned. What helps endurance, what doesn't. All that. You keep offering these little gems here and there, and I keep thinking that your experience would be a great addition to what we've learned from Maffetone. I wish HE would offer more specific examples of what he saw along the way as well. Thanks for posting what you have already. --JImmy
                              jimmyb


                                Going through "Eating For Endurance" by Phil Maffetone. He has a chapter called " the 40-30-30 myth." One thing he mentions is that when counting carbs and figuring a % of calories, that you should subtract the number of grams of fiber from the total carbs before doing it. He says these carbs from fiber are not absorbed, so should not be included. He says 30% from fat is good, but that the carb and protein percentages will vary for different people. --Jimmy