I'll get back to you on that data, C.
I've never done a % progress study of aerobic phase vs. anaerobic, combined, etc.
A quickie while I have time:
AErobic BAse:
12.4% 8/1/09 thru 10/19/09 (2 months, 18 days) (overall pace)
--jimmy
running log / profile / Crusted Salt comic strip / blog / running of the bulls
Here's another period of substantial improvement and how it broke down. THis was the best I've been.
2/17/06 thru 9/26/06 20% improvement (10:14 to 8:31)
Breakdown:
2/17 to 3/26 all MAF and below 4% (this was the second half of an aerobic base period, the first half I regressed a bit due to injury)
3/26 to 8/7 anaerobic / race season 10% (mostly MAF workouts, races, and a few tempo runs mixed in)
8/7 to 9/26 all MAF (save one run) 6%
thanks, very informative data. it appears one should expect to be progressing at least as much at pure MAF phase as in an anaerobic phase + keeping the results from anaerobic phase.
Like I said, when you follow up a decent pure base phase with a race season, you should see more improvement.
--Jimmy
Like I said, when you follow up a decent pure base phase with a race season, you should see more improvement. --Jimmy
yes I get that - what I meant was something else (improving even before anaerobic season arrives).
Yeah, that's what I said.
© 2013 RunningAHEAD, LLC. All rights reserved. | Privacy