Low HR Training

123

Your experiences with LHR training (Read 1246 times)

jimmyb


port-a-bella-potty

    I'll get back to you on that data, C.

    I've never done a % progress study of aerobic phase vs. anaerobic, combined, etc.

     

    A  quickie while I have time:

     

    AErobic BAse:

    12.4%  8/1/09 thru  10/19/09 (2 months, 18 days) (overall pace)

     

    --jimmy

    Log    PRs

    jimmyb


    port-a-bella-potty

      Here's another period of substantial improvement and how it broke down. THis was the best I've been.

       

      2/17/06 thru 9/26/06  20% improvement (10:14 to 8:31)

      Breakdown:

      2/17 to 3/26 all MAF and below  4% (this was the second half of an aerobic base period, the first half I regressed a bit due to injury)

      3/26 to 8/7 anaerobic / race season 10% (mostly MAF workouts, races, and a few tempo runs mixed in)

      8/7 to 9/26 all MAF (save one run) 6%

       

       

       

       

       

      Log    PRs

        thanks, very informative data. it appears one should expect to be progressing at least as much at pure MAF phase as in an anaerobic phase + keeping the results from anaerobic phase. Smile

        jimmyb


        port-a-bella-potty

          thanks, very informative data. it appears one should expect to be progressing at least as much at pure MAF phase as in an anaerobic phase + keeping the results from anaerobic phase. Smile

           

          Like I said, when you follow up a decent pure base phase with a race season, you should see more improvement.

          --Jimmy

          Log    PRs

             

            Like I said, when you follow up a decent pure base phase with a race season, you should see more improvement.

            --Jimmy

             

            yes I get that - what I meant was something else (improving even before anaerobic season arrives).

            jimmyb


            port-a-bella-potty

              Yeah, that's what I said. Cool

              Log    PRs

              123