Login
|
Help
Home
Training Log
Resources
Measure Route
Find Routes
Calculators
Community
Join Now!
Forums
User Groups
Browse User Logs
User Groups
>
UK Ultra Runners
>
Forum
>
Walk/Run Strategy
UK Ultra Runners
Home
Forum
Maps
Reports
Walk/Run Strategy (Read 193 times)
UltraFlynn
posted: 5/14/2009 at 8:47 AM
Having done 3 ultras now, all of which around the 30 mile mark, it's time to consider how I'm going to get through a 50+ mile race.
I've managed to run continuously on all the event I've done thus far but going on how I've felt at the endI don't think it's sensible to assume that I'm going to continuous run a longer event.
I'm a big believer in planning things and having a game plan and I don't want to be surprised during the race that I suddenly cannot keep running. So I planning a run/walk strategy.
Reading up about it I could use the 25 min run/5 min walk strategy, or 5 min run/ 1 min walk. It goes against the grain to be actively planning to walk but it seems to be an accepted thing to do.
Does anyone have any thoughts/experiences around this?
Jerry-
An experiment of one
posted: 5/14/2009 at 10:00 AM
I think 5:1 (5 min run:1 min walk) is a little excessive and will probably do more harm than good IMHO
I have heard of various techniques similar to:
28:2 or
55:5
I have heard Purdey talk of this method when he was doing the Crawley 12 hour and he was pretty well disciplined enough to do it and used the walking breaks to take on board well needed fluids and foods. Knowing you from the Chislet run I know you are quite a disciplined kind of chap.
The few ultras I have done have been trail events so the strategy was quite different to track events where the 28:2 or 55:5 regime can be easily implemented, on trail I approached it with the "Walk the hills, run the flats" and then ensured my food/fluid regimen was much more strictly controlled. My view is 2 minutes wasted on an up hill is 4 minutes saved later on as I needed to keep some energy in the bank. At Compton I found that I was walking just as fast as a person runner and they were just sapping the energy out of their calves.
At the marathon on Saturday my good friend Brian ran the first 13.1 mile loop and power walked the second 13.1 miles....reason, he is training for a 100 mile ultra and was training his legs to take the strain.
Yes it goes against the grain of the seasoned runner, but there are other races to run
Jerry
Sponsor me to run 100km+ in 12 hours for the Prostate Cancer Charity
UK Ultra Runners
A runners blog
-updated daily
UltraFlynn
posted: 5/14/2009 at 10:22 AM
What I don't want to do is get to 35-40 miles and simply not be able to continue. I want to give myself the best possible chance of completing the distance and all the advice I can find from seasoned ultra runners maintains that run/walk is an appropriate strategy. I don't want to get the "zombie running" stage where it would be quicker to walk but I wont be able to because I've knackered my legs.
My plan is that next Wednesday evening I'm going out for a long run and I'm go to run/walk it and see how I feel. I don't want to be trying it out on the day of the race.
Jerry-
An experiment of one
posted: 5/14/2009 at 11:02 AM
Definitely, at the Compton 40 we walked " ever so often" and it really was a godsend and kept the heart rate well down. At some points we were comfortably running 8:15 min/miles which reduced to 9:30 min/miles depending on the terrain.
As an aside but connected I find that rests at checkpoints a real benefit to properly replenish with food/drink, get the legs right the heart rate down and then move on at a run pace.
Jerry
Sponsor me to run 100km+ in 12 hours for the Prostate Cancer Charity
UK Ultra Runners
A runners blog
-updated daily
Purdey
06.05.54 3:59.4
posted: 5/14/2009 at 2:22 PM
Quote from UltraFlynn on 5/14/2009 at 10:22 AM:
I don't want to be trying it out on the day of the race.
Good idea.
It really is up to you. I like 28/2 with a plan to increase to 25/5 as soon as you feel you need it. I think that anything over 40/50 miles needs walking breaks from the outset, unless you are a national standard ultra runner.
Even national runners only run continuously for 100km. Anything beyond that then most of them will be walking at some point.
It is definitely best to plan to walk rather than to be forced into it. Better psychologically too.
Nothing to say at the moment.
UltraFlynn
posted: 5/14/2009 at 8:41 PM
That's great advice. Thanks.
You're perfectly correct. To enter into a 50+ mile event and expect to run all of it is just going to lead to disappointment. I'm not a talented runner and I'm never going to win events. What I can do is maximum my potential and that means being intelligent about strategy and making sure I've done my research.
I would very much like to plan to walk and have that as a decision already made than crash badly and be forced into a route march.
I think the key thing to get into my head is that I can train all I want, what I cannot do on a very regular basis is test myself at extreme distances. The only way to do that is during an event. I want to get to the end of the events knowing that I completed it in the best time I could, feeling the best that I can.
User Groups
>
UK Ultra Runners
>
Forum
>
Walk/Run Strategy
Feedback
|
Help
© 2010 RunningAHEAD.com. All rights reserved.