Forums >Off the Beaten Path>Radiohead - In Rainbows
Perspective from the NYTimes. Interesting how the article still is written in terms of economic self-interest. The ethical moment is construed as a personal feeling, the "warm glow," almost indistinguishable from the "warm glow" we get when sitting in front of the television. On this view, mbk wasn't buying an album, he was buying a warm glow. When the ethical moment becomes a product to be purchased, then ethics of marketing (or is it the marketing of ethics?) becomes problematic, to say the least.
Why is it sideways?
If the "warm glow" was an unintended consequence of the transaction then I would feel OK. If the "warm glow" was the marketing hook to make me buy, then I feel like a dupe. In reality I'm probably a dupe since everything is marketed.