Forums >Racing>pace difference between short and long runs
Runners run
Excellent revision. Now the important question is can you offer me anything better than a Corona?
Think Whirled Peas
I see how it is, Q. You're mad about how the Sox treated the Tigers over the last 4 days and now you're trying the old, "Will you hold this a second?" trick with your empty. Nice.
Just because running is simple does not mean it is easy.
Relentless. Forward. Motion. <repeat>
What's a good pace difference between short and long runs. )?
It's not short and long runs. Easy runs can be short or long, as can quality work. Most of your runs, short and long, should be easy, and probably about the same pace.
2008 Goals: 10k < 44, HM < 1:40, learn to use my Garmin
Since I like to run at lunch time, making them short and fast (does that make it a quality run?) fits in better with my schedule. Then I'll mosey out longer weekend runs (12 or so). I should probably race a 10k sooner to help baseline my current pace and then target 1 - 2 min / mi slower. Haven't done one in 2 yrs. yikes. (I have a HRM but honestly don't know my max HR or really know what to do with the numbers that are reported. I have figured out that I don't have good aerobic capacity though, since I can't get my HR below ~145 or so.) I'm not much of an interval or track work out person., and while I've been running for a while, it's been almost exclusively just runs. Maybe time for something different.
Don't make those lunchtime runs short and fast except once maybe twice a week. Make them short and slow. I don't know a whole lot about the HR thing, but looking through your log quickly, you seem to take a lot of days off. Making a short run slower and adding another short easy run in place of a day off is the best thing to do.