Forums >Racing>Interval purposes (side topic from pg3 of "other than experience" thread)
E-mail: eric.fuller.mail@gmail.com -----------------------------
1983
So how do you know when you have gone over the edge and gone too far, making the transition from high aerobic to anerobic?
Runners run
The Greatest of All Time
Except for type 1 intervals in spaniel's great post, I think it's good to start with recoveries equal in duration to the hard part, and shrink the recovery times as you get better. (i.e. if you do 6x800m in 3:00 each, start with a 3-minute recovery). Spaniel also makes a good point in that it's usually better to reduce recovery times as you advance, rather than pile on more reps.
I've got a fever...
So how do you know when you have gone over the edge and gone too far, making the transition from high aerobic to anerobic? When you have to slow down the reps or take longer recoveries.
On your deathbed, you won't wish that you'd spent more time at the office. But you will wish that you'd spent more time running. Because if you had, you wouldn't be on your deathbed.
straw man
He who has the best time wins. Jerry
Hawt and sexy
I'm touching your pants.
Going off-topic in the other thread, so I'm bringning it here. I was relating the concept of using relatively short recoveries between intervals when trying to achieve high-end aerobic development. The questions were asked why, what I was trying to acheive, etc etc. So here it goes. There are three basic types of intervals, each with a purpose: 1) 200-400m intervals with long recoveries: The purpose of this workout is to develop raw speed, working on strength, turnover, and fast-twitch muscle coordination. To achieve this, it is important to run each interval as fast as possible. Long recoveries are used to make sure you can run each interval near maximal pace. By definition, these intervals are limited to a max of 400m in length as you can't sustain speed longer than this. If you are prepping for a 800m or 1500/1600m race, you may do 600-800m in this workout though you will likely no longer be at maximal speed, but doing more or a race simulation (ie running 800m at 1500m race pace). These workouts are actually not very fatiguing, because if you accumulate residual fatigue between intervals you can't sustain the speed required in the workout. Of the three types, this will have the fewest number of intervals in a set. 2) 400m-1600m intervals with medium recoveries The purpose of this workout is to go into anaerobic debt on each interval and thereby stimulat building up your anaerobic capacity. This can also help somewhat with strength and speed tolerance. Moderate recoveries (say, 3+min for a 400m etc) are used to allow time to clear the lactic acid from your system and get HR back near baseline in order to be able to repeat the effort in the next interval. Comparing a 400m under this strategy to a 400m under #1 above, the time will be slower. This workout will actually feel much harder on you that #1 above, because you are working your anaerobic system so hard. 3) 400m-3000m intervals with short recoveries The purpose of this workout is to give your body an extended period of time at the very upper limits of your aerobic zone. This is probably also the best way to develop speed tolerance for 5K-10K paced races. This is the only one of the three types where your recovery will be shorter than your intervals. For example, I run 800m intervals in 2:22-2:30 avg depending on conditioning but only jog recover 90sec. Sets will also be longer than the other two types. (I do 8-10X800 or 6-8X1000 typically). The short recoveries bring you back just enough to be able to go out and do the next interval just as fast, or slightly faster than, the previous one (if you lose the ability to hit your target in the middle of the set, start slower the next time!). Using this strategy, you spend the whole workout at a very high aerobic capacity, with each interval inching you closer and closer to anaerobic. Due to the constant demand, this is probably the most demanding of the types. Say you run a 5K in 16:00. While races are always good for development, you will rely heavily on the anaerobic component in the end stages of the race so you expose your body to high-end aerobic effort less than that 17:00. However, say you do 8X800 in 2:30 avg with 90sec recoveries. That workout will take you 32 minutes to complete, and the only time you tap anaerobic is if you try to blow out the last interval fast. You've just gotten yourself nearly twice the amount of time at sustained high-end aerobic effort! Think what that does for your development and the ability to hold high-end aerobic paces in your next race. The bulk of my speed workouts are #3. I will use #2 as a sharpening tool 2-3 times going into a key race under 10K. The only time I have used #1 post-college was when I was picked to run an 800m leg at the USATF Indoor Championships on a distance medley relay team. It only took 3 weeks of doing two #1 workouts per week to find speed I hadn't known I had since high school. #1 gives up its gains in just a few weeks. #2 takes a bit longer. I've successfully continued to gain by #3 for up to 4 months. But they should be ideally applied in the reverse order (#3 followed by #2 then #1 time-wise). When using #3, I suggest those newer to intervals start out at 2 miles of total intervals and work their way up. A well-conditioned and relatively quick runner should be able to get in 4 miles of these intervals in a session (not counting recoveries). When I was peaking out I could get 5 miles of intervals in a workout but I would not recommend that unless you are winning races and runnin 90+ mpw. I have experimented with longer intervals, all the way up to 3200m. 3X3200m with 5min recovery is a great workout but the pace is getting too slow to consider it in any of the groupings above. The two last interval workouts I ran before my 10K PR were 4X2000m then 3X3000m workouts at 10K goal pace. I always dreamed of running 3X5000m with 7min recovery in 16:00 or faster but it never worked out.
How To Run a Marathon: Step 1 - start running. There is no Step 2.
Prince of Fatness
Not at it at all.
When you have to slow down the reps or take longer recoveries.
Feeling the growl again
All right, stupid and overly broad question for you then: does that mean that by definition the proper interval pace for the distance (and the appropriate recovery time) should be the fastest you can go (and the shortest recoveries you can take) while still maintaining the same speed and recovery times? -------- And as long as you folks are dispensing the wisdom, how about some more discussion specifically on the recoveries. A little bit of experience (with some help from McMillan) has given me a pretty solid idea of what paces are appropriate for intervals from 200m to 1600m. I know what's too hard too maintain and what's too easy to run. But choosing appropriate time (and pace) for recoveries is a little baffling. Part of why Spaniel's post here resonated with me is that I think I tend to make exactly the mistake he describes. So what is the most effective recovery? Jogging or walking? Does it matter? Should the recovery be the shortest possible that will still permit you to complete the next interval at the appropriate pace and complete the rest of the sets?
"If you want to be a bad a$s, then do what a bad a$s does. There's your pep talk for today. Go Run." -- Slo_Hand
I am spaniel - Crusher of Treadmills
So what spaniel has not talked about is why we do various wacky workouts like ladders and pyramids. And why do they seem to have so many different recoveries? (jog N meters, rest N seconds, etc.) Some of the workouts done by the group I run with just have me shaking my head. e.g. 1600 at THRESHOLD pace (1:00 rest) 800 at INTERVAL pace (2:30 rest) 400 at REPEAT pace (400 m jog rest) 200 at REPEAT pace (200 m jog rest) 400 at REPEAT pace (400 m jog rest) 600 at INTERVAL pace (2:00 rest) 800 at INTERVAL pace (2:00 rest) WTF? It makes me long for a simple, random fartlek. Run hard, run easy, repeat...