Forums >General Running>So what would your evaluation of this running technique be?
Biomimeticist
<http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200512/23/images/1222_B76.jpg>
Experts said the world is flat
Experts said that man would never fly
Experts said we'd never go to the moon
Name me one of those "experts"...
History never remembers the name of experts; just the innovators who had the guts to challenge and prove the "experts" wrong
too much armswing.
"If you have the fire, run..." -John Climacus
why?
because the sun exploded at the end.
Do you recognize them?
Yes, why do you think I am wearing a tinfoil helmet? Because I think it's fashionable? Come on, man.
Hi Robert! I hope all is well for you. Happy New Year!
inline, short steps, deep steps (flat footed?).
Where is this photo taken?
I noticed that it's on a Chinese website....
Brian
Life Goals:
#1: Do what I can do
#2: Enjoy life
They're 35,000 years old....
Mungo Park Australia...
They're 35,000 years old.... Mungo Park Australia...
Cool, Thanks for sharing.
Given they were extrapolated to be running as fast as Usain Bolt, I think it speaks volumes to how little we know about running....
I wonder if they could walk 7 MPH
Probably... Or close to it...
Inline technique, far more efficient than parallel landing. Longer stride, better use of tendons.
Elite sprinting speed, and heel strike, looks like they know more about running than you do.
Even upon closer inspection, I don't see any midfoot or forefoot landing...
http://www.clinicalgaitanalysis.com/art/mungo.jpg
not bad for mile 25
I don't see how someone could leave a print that deep and clean while running. Try it on a beach sometime.
Probably... Or close to it... Inline technique, far more efficient than parallel landing. Longer stride, better use of tendons. Elite sprinting speed, and heel strike, looks like they know more about running than you do.
If you look past the first 4 steps, it's not an inline technique.