2018 3:20 (and beyond) (Read 582 times)

fb-guy


    Is there a reliable age-grade calculator? They seem to be all over the map.

     

    I did 2:55:41 and 37:14 at 54, and I think my 10K ag is higher than my marathon -- around 83.5. But I think ag's change as world records change -- although the 10k record isn't going anywhere soon. The Bekele WR races are pretty amazing to watch on Youtube. Now I just need to stop being a slow old fart.

     

    Altra Vanish-R -- 4.5 oz and dead flat. hahahahahahaha.

    m: 2:55:04 | 10k: 37:14 | 50mile: 9:35

    pepperjack


    pie man

      I use the Howard Grubb one cause it lets me go back to the early 80s with my times.  And more distance options.

       

      i can get a few things over 80% with my high school times.  Surprisingly the 800 is the highest (it still subtracts time at 18, which is funny cause I definitely didn’t get any faster).  The mile at age 7 also gets me 80+

       

      i have an offer to be an archaeology technician in Mendocino national forest.  So I might be headed from one thread cluster area to another.  It’s only for a few months at this point, but we’ll see where it leads.  But I really want to go.

      11:11 3,000 (recent)

      Running Problem


      Problem Child

        dad Bad geography....Annapolis. For some reason I thought it was closer to DC, or people here commuted that far.

         

        Keen thansk for the insite. I have a pair of shoes (New Balance Fresh Foam Zante) I use for faster work.

         

        omr Truthfully, I think my bounce is as random as it can be. Case in point, today I did 4 miles (7:48, 7:21, 7:14, 7:09) on rolling hill, flat and downhill. I then did about 2.5 on flat loop (8:36, 8:35, 8:44 half mile) pace. Bounce was 4.3-4.35 for fast miles and 4.25 for slow miles.

        Braking was 1.28, 1.3, 1.27, 1.19, 0.95, 0.93, 0.95. Since keen mentioned over striding I THINK he might be on to something. On some previous 400m intervals my braking was 1.34, bounce 3.3. I stood still in between repeats. It seems to repeat itself looking through history of runs with fast and slower miles mixed together.

         

        some quick google fu pulls this out of an article

        "The longer the stride, the greater amount of vertical displacement. This means the further out you stride, the higher you jump in the air and, therefore, the harder you land on the ground."

         

        So...any suggestions on how to quit over striding when my cadence is sitting at or near 180? It doesn't feel like I'm running any differently when I go fast or slower. Now that I look over more data I've collected it's almost TOO much data.

        Many of us aren't sure what the hell point you are trying to make and no matter how we guess, it always seems to be something else. Which usually means a person is doing it on purpose.

        VDOT 53.37 

        5k18:xx | Marathon 2:55:22

        runethechamp


          Brew - My quick advice on running form and limiting overstriding (and I know I can do this a lot better myself) is to think about what the task of your legs is when you are running, and that is to propel you forward. To do that you want them to push back. So when I feel my form suffering a bit I try to think that the job is to push the legs back when they hit the ground, and leave the other stuff alone. I think earlier my thoughts have been more on the "swing the leg forward"part of the running, and it still happens a lot, but to me this seems to help.

          5k: 20:32 (1/17)  |  HM: 1:34:37 (2/18)  |  FM: 3:31:37 (3/18)

           

          Getting back into it

            I use the Howard Grubb one cause it lets me go back to the early 80s with my times.  And more distance options.

             

            I hadn't thought about going back! My 1500 PR nets an 84.36%; my 5000m and 10000m PRs are 79.xx and my 8K is 80+. 

             

            PJ ~ Sounds cool. 

             

            Brew ~ Well, some people do make that commute. 

            darkwave


            Mother of Cats

              Doing some catch up...

               

               

              DW -  Just wondering, what is your standard race morning breakfast? I've read things lately that jive a lot with your race preparation (no big meals the day before for instance) and I might try to experiment a bit in my halfs this fall.

               

              So...I eat pretty much the same thing in the last 24 hours before a marathon or my 20+milers.

               

              Breakfast each morning is brown rice mixed with either hemp powder or egg, and then salted and flavored with GUs, plus snacking on a GU gluten-free stroopwafel.   This is my pre-run breakfast  that is tried and true - digests well, passes quickly (especially if the GUs are caffeinated), and gives me plenty of energy.  I do have to be a bit selective with the GUs as I don't tolerate all of them equally well - some of the flavors (chocolate-mint especially) give me heartburn and aggravate my vocal chord dysfunction.  That's why I always note in my log exactly what I ate pre-run and whether it sat well.

               

              I mix in the hemp powder or egg because I don't run well on pure carbs - I need some protein and fat to balance stuff out.  And those are both proteins that digest very easily.  I usuallly go with hemp powder just because it's easier to carry to races.  It was a pain to get to a race and then go hunting eggs and figuring out how to cook them in a hotel room.

               

              Lunch the day before the marathon is my biggest meal.  Chipotle - some mix of steak or chicken and brown rice, plus chips.  Heavily salted.  No salsa, beans, or guac.  I usually get more than one bowl.  I'll often also ship up a can of green beans to add in so I get some veggies (the Chipotle onions are a bit risky, pre-race.

               

              Dinner before the marathon is usually just UCAN mixed with coconut water.  Pre-Grandma's, I skipped dinner altogether.

               

              Please note that this is all very individual to me.  I have all sorts of digestive troubles as well as chronic migraines and desperately need to avoid gluten, lactose, soy, nuts, MSG, tyramine (in aged/fermented foods), and artificial sweeteners at all times.  I can't function on them, let alone run or race.  Stuff like onions, salsa, lentils, beans is mildly problematic, digestion-wise, so I avoid immediately before a race but eat at other times.

               

              I wouldn't recommend anyone else mimic my exact pre-race diet unless you have my exact same set of food intolerances/migraine triggers.  I do think it's good to nail down what your diet is the last 24 hours pre-goal race, and figure out how to execute that diet when traveling.  Everything I've listed above is either something that travels with me, or Chipotle.

               

               

               

              Flats -- what constitutes a real flat? Is it weight and flatness? Which shoe are people buying?

               

              I think a flat is defined by low heel drop and low stack-height.  And light weight goes with that.    It's all semantics.  Some call the Adios a "marathon flat" which to me is the running equivalent of jumbo shrimp.

               

              I do consider my Takumi Sens to be flats.  For marathoning I've never worn a "true" (by my definition) flat.  I've worn (from fastest marathon to slowest): 1) Vaporfly; 2) Kinvara 2; 3-5)Adios 2 Boost, 6) Vaporfly, 7-9) Boston Boost.

               

              I think the best test for what shoe to wear in your marathon is whatever shoe feels best at the end of a 20+ mile long run with marathon pace included in the run.  How my feet feel at the end of those workouts is EXACTLY how my feet feel from 20 miles plus in a marathon.

               

               

               

               

              LuumoRun It works without your phone. It syncs with the GPS data from my Garmin. Kind of a process but the LumoRun syncs itself first and shows you 5 minute intervals. 5

               

              So...I'm confused.  I get that you can run without your phone and it will sync up later.  So that's cool.  But don't you still need to have an iPhone to sync it up?  The website implies that it does not sync directly with computers and it definitely doesn't sync with Android.  So practically unusable if you don't have an IPhone since you can't pull data off of it.

               

              Age-grading - I think we should have a hall of fame for anyone who hits 80% age grade in a marathon.  Ilana - I think you should round up.  For age-grading, I use Howard Grubb, with the 2015 factor (the other factor will give you a better score.

               

              ***

               

              11 miles.  5 miles easy (9:10), then 8 "hill strides" (60-70 seconds each) with 2:30 recovery jogging a loop back down to the bottom.  3 miles cool-down (9:28) plus injury prevention/leg strengthwork and some recovery swimming.

              Everyone's gotta running blog; I'm the only one with a POOL-RUNNING blog.

               

              And...if you want a running Instagram where all the pictures are of cats, I've got you covered.

              darkwave


              Mother of Cats

                d

                Braking was 1.28, 1.3, 1.27, 1.19, 0.95, 0.93, 0.95. Since keen mentioned over striding I THINK he might be on to something. On some previous 400m intervals my braking was 1.34, bounce 3.3. I stood still in between repeats. It seems to repeat itself looking through history of runs with fast and slower miles mixed together.

                 

                some quick google fu pulls this out of an article

                "The longer the stride, the greater amount of vertical displacement. This means the further out you stride, the higher you jump in the air and, therefore, the harder you land on the ground."

                 

                So...any suggestions on how to quit over striding when my cadence is sitting at or near 180? It doesn't feel like I'm running any differently when I go fast or slower. Now that I look over more data I've collected it's almost TOO much data.

                 

                One over-arching comment: At the end of the day, there are two metrics that truly matter to us: race time and race place.  Every other metric, be it your pace during runs, your mileage, or stuff like vertical oscillation, matter only in that they may indicate how to improve the two things that do matter.

                 

                I think it's interesting to look at all these things like cadence, left-right balance, but don't get too lost in them  There is a certain sub-set of runner,s, (they're actually pretty obvious once you know how to pick them out) who are trying to perfect those metrics - thinking very very hard about exactly how they run.

                 

                And they do succeed in improving those tertiary metrics, but they never get any faster  And many times they get slower.  And look ridiculous to boot.

                 

                Don't be one of them.

                Everyone's gotta running blog; I'm the only one with a POOL-RUNNING blog.

                 

                And...if you want a running Instagram where all the pictures are of cats, I've got you covered.

                   

                  I think a flat is defined by low heel drop and low stack-height.  And light weight goes with that.    It's all semantics.  

                   

                  In addition, most "racing flats" (as I call them) are a bit narrow and stiff.  e.g. I wouldn't call Altra Vanish or New Balance "minimus" shoes racing flats even thought they are light, low-to-the-ground and zero drop (as they are wide and very flexible)

                   

                  The racing flat I used was New Balance Hanzo

                  fb-guy


                    Rovatti, DW, Jim, et al -- very interesting stuff. Thanks. It seems like a racing flat is a thing. Stiff and thin to help throw you forward for the mile or 5K racing. Whereas a flat is a flat (thin, no heel raise) running shoe that people use for training and racing. All racing flats are flats, but not all flats are racing flats. Or something like that. Anyway -- thanks. I like flat, light shoes. Can't image Hokas.

                     

                    Here's some interesting timing -- Lumo went bust a couple of days ago. There's a statement on their website.

                     

                    DW -- compliments on getting your hands around you food sensitivity issues. That can't be easy, but you've got it working.

                     

                    Brew, Rune -- the bounce idea behind Lumo (or just trying to run better) is interesting. Running is basically an A-to-B sport, and maybe too much C (up) isn't a great thing. Without really knowing what I'm doing, I'm going to concentrate a pushing my body forward (not upward) and a lower trajectory and see if it feels a little more easy on the legs and a little more efficient. Maybe.

                     

                    PJ -- very cool. It's incredibly pretty up there.

                    m: 2:55:04 | 10k: 37:14 | 50mile: 9:35

                    OMR


                      Brew:  I agree with Dwave about not getting too caught up in the data, but at the same time, I think there is a place for experimentation.  For example, I have, in the past, run 200s where I focus on different aspects of running just to see how it impacts my pace.  It usually involves focusing on just one thing, such as a faster cadence, a slight forward lean from the ankles, more or less arm swing, keeping my head from bouncing up and down, or trying to get my feet off the ground more quickly.  I did find that there was a happy place that involved a faster cadence and slightly shorter stride from what I subconsciously believed would make me faster.  And even if my pace was slower when my cadence got beyond a certain point, it doesn't make an overly fast cadence a bad exercise/drill.  But, as with golf, there is a time for focusing on mechanics, and a time to play the game, so it wasn't something I thought much about except during those 200s.  One interesting difference between your data and mine is that my bounce goes down when I run faster, and yours goes up.  I don't know what that means...I just find it interesting.  What I've found works for me, in terms of being more efficient, is to just focus on "running quietly."  Perhaps this is why I struggle more with the shorter stuff...maybe I should be thinking about running more explosively?

                       

                      fb:  2:55:41 and 37:14 at age 54, you say?  Hmm...I'm about to turn 54.  That gives me a year.    Oh, and I guess I won't be getting a Lumo.

                      pj:  Cool, congrats.  Do they need any music theorist/composer types?! 

                      pepperjack


                      pie man

                        My 1400s that I just bought are 10mm drop (had to look it up).  I can’t imagine calling them anything but racing flats (and new balance seems to agree)

                        11:11 3,000 (recent)

                        darkwave


                        Mother of Cats

                          My 1400s that I just bought are 10mm drop (had to look it up).  I can’t imagine calling them anything but racing flats (and new balance seems to agree)

                           

                          They are tilted flats....

                           

                          As I said before, I think "racing flats" are somewat self-defined.  Building on Rovatti's point, my Nike Frees are thin, light, and low heeldrop/low stackheight.  But I'd never race in them.  They are way too flexible to be fast

                           

                          In a discussion elsewhere, someone described the Kinvara and the Boston Boost as racing flats.  I got a little eye-rolly.  Someone else described the Vaporfly as a racing flat.  I got very very eye-rolly.

                           

                          Vertical oscillation - mine goes down as I run faster (Stryd and Garmin both measure it).  Stryd also measures "leg spring stiffness" which is supposed to decrease as you tire, but mine increases instead.  Go figure.

                           

                          8 miles very easy to yoga (9:19), yoga, then 4 miles very easy (9:14) plus drills and strides.

                          Everyone's gotta running blog; I'm the only one with a POOL-RUNNING blog.

                           

                          And...if you want a running Instagram where all the pictures are of cats, I've got you covered.

                          fb-guy


                            Kinvara are cushy recovery shoes for when your feet hurt. :-)

                            m: 2:55:04 | 10k: 37:14 | 50mile: 9:35

                              I don't run well on pure carbs - I need some protein and fat to balance stuff out.

                               

                              I've definitely found this to be true too.

                               

                              10x400m w/ 200m jog (90, 88, 89, 91, 92, 92, 95, 91, 92, 93) today.

                               

                              Happy 4th!

                                For PJ in particular: thread on LRC about Lagat accidentally invents new event: "Steeple Marathon." My legs fell off just thinking about it!