Why did I stop getting better? (Read 463 times)

I'm not trying to get faster at walking, I like walking slowly. I'm trying to get faster at running. I accept your challenge but let's make it a running 5k (you can walk if you want, but I'm running.). Thanksgiving day, I'm running a 5k in St. Louis. If you win, I'll let you teach me your program. If I win you leave this site and never come back. Deal?

Running doesn't make you a faster walker; however learning to be a faster walker will easily make you a faster runner.

If you can't understand that logic, then all deals are off....

Show data to prove it.

 

Oh please princess. The women of Kenya prove you're an idiot. Every keystroke you punch makes it obvious...

 

Tell me how they WALK carrying 20% of their bodyweight with no increase in energy expenditure to do so and I'll leave this forum forever (granted you don't plagiarize my writing of course).

This forum is about running, not walking with jars on ones' head.  Show the data that proves this translates to running.

 

I'll leave this forum forever (granted you don't plagiarize my writing of course).

Hey, here's an idea - why not leave because nobody wants to listen to you? Nobody cares what you say. Nobody believes your theories. Perhaps there is a Pygmy forum or a cat fancier forum or a ostrich racer forum, where they would welcome you. heck, I'm sure there must be a walking forum where they might listen to you.

 

Hey, here's an idea - why not leave because nobody wants to listen to you?

If you don't like my writing, the cite the science that says I'm wrong. otherwise, you can go drink my mother's barf if you think that you know more than I do.

I otherwise, you can go drink my mother's barf 

The language of a true genius.  Take notes, you plebes...

Science doesn't go around disproving random ideas. I mean, maybe with a billion monkeys sitting at a billion typewriters...

You know, come to think of it, monkeys thumbs don't directly oppose their hands and are of more similar length to their other fingers. That gives them the ability to project their digits in a typing motion with efficiency that nobody except a Bangladeshi on meth could muster. While sitting around eating pot pies in my moms basement, I developed a method that makes it so that humans can mimic this technique, enabling them to type with 20% greater speed. Show me the science that proves me wrong.

Science doesn't go around disproving random ideas. I mean, maybe with a billion monkeys sitting at a billion typewriters...

 

You know, come to think of it, monkeys thumbs don't directly oppose their hands and are of more similar length to their other fingers. That gives them the ability to project their digits in a typing motion with efficiency that nobody except a Bangladeshi on meth could muster. While sitting around eating pot pies in my moms basement, I developed a method that makes it so that humans can mimic this technique, enabling them to type with 20% greater speed. Show me the science that proves me wrong.

That's easy: show me the EKG measurement of the primary muscles of the motion naturally and the EKG measurement of the same muscles after your 20% technique improvements are described and implemented.

I can measure your quads in your natural running form through EKG measure, and your quads at the same speed after learning how Kenyans really run. If that measure is 15% lower energy output, then the improvement in running economy is fully able to be documented.

Can your throwing theory prove the same?