AHR of 143 (MAF is 146 - and that 143 is averaging also where the HRM freaked out and would read in the 220s a couple times).
Also, the benefits of this approach are generally proportional to running volume (to paraphrase Mark Allen's endorsement of the Maffetone method). If you are exercising <15 mi="" week,="" it="" is="" debatable="" as="" to="" whether="" or="" not="" you="" are="" getting="" enough="" low="" hr="" training=""></15>
So that's my question. If my choices are to spend an hour 4 times a week going 4.5-5 miles or going 3 with my heart rate below MAF - which is the better way to spend my time?
"Run slowly, run daily, drink in moderation, and don't eat like a pig" Dr. Ernst Van Aaken. Sorry ultrasteve.
So, since I'm really enjoying the super slow running, I think there's no real reason to stop now - especially since I've already seen an improvement in my speed at MAF. I figure if I can get to 20 mpw at MAF prior to beginning my half marathon training in March, it will be a fantastic base, regardless of my speed and at that point I'll decide based on my progress to that point whether I do my training at MAF or not. I'll be the guinea pig on this issue, since it seems like it's just something that people haven't seen done. Also, shouldn't the mileage below MAF be better for the weight loss?