Forums >General Running>Personal proof that running easy works
Dave
I ran a mile and I liked it, liked it, liked it. dgb2n@yahoo.com
Giant Flaming Dork
campisi - I appreciate and understand your concern, and I would agree that many new runners fall into this trap. ... Having said that, I just realized that lots of folks train exclusively by pace, without considering HR at all, which is a completely different approach. With all that in mind, is there still some benefit to be gained by training at a set slower pace for extended periods at a set lower pace?
http://xkcd.com/621/
You may want to listen to Ken. I started running again about 6 months ago. My "easy" training pace has been on a steady ramp down from a 11mm "easy" training pace to 9:15mm "easy" training pace. Like you, I have been using the HRM to ensure that I don't run too hard (144bpm max). Lately I have been experiencing some slight injuries that are not keeping me from running, but they are limiting my training. I have a feeling it's from over training by not limiting pace as well as effort (heart rate). Over the next few weeks, I am going to back off further from my pace (10:00mm) and see if the issues I'm having go away. If you need some real motivation about going slow - see willamona's training and race paces. Obviously my issues are just random data points, but something to consider.
campisi - I appreciate and understand your concern, and I would agree that many new runners fall into this trap. However, I have reigned in this tendency to run faster than I should by training with a HR monitor. I've used 160 as my upper HR limit since around December. This is above my MAF, but below the upper end of easy runs using an HRR method, so I'm solidly in the easy aerobic zone. That's why this improvement is exciting to me, because it's happened with a steady HR limit and actually a slightly declining average HR. Having said that, I just realized that lots of folks train exclusively by pace, without considering HR at all, which is a completely different approach. Do you perhaps fall into that camp? If so, does it make any difference to know that I'm still training at >3 minutes off my 5k pace? With all that in mind, is there still some benefit to be gained by training at a set slower pace for extended periods at a set lower pace?
I am a 'pace' guy (just because I've never owned an HRM) so I go by pace. And it does make a difference to know you're training at > 3minutes slower than your 5K pace - I can relate to pace! That seems adequately slow enough. Then I'd say just keep training, try to be more consistent with the amount of days you run even if that means running slower or shorter. Don't push too hard and be careful of trying to continue improving at the same rate!
...I'm certainly not burning up the roads, but I've dropped 30s per mile in the last 4 weeks by being consistent and doing what needs to be done...
Prince of Fatness
Congratulations. My experience wasn't as successful as yours, I was doing only easy miles from November to January and lost speed, so next time I'm in between training periods, I'll be including at least some strides or fartlek to keep the leg speed up.
Not at it at all.
Did you keep your mileage up, too? I ran easy all last winter but kept my mileage up, and my race times have gone down. Notice I didn't say I got faster. Running easy and longer has not made me faster, but it has allowed me to hold a fast pace much longer.