Forums >Running 101>Is it all just a marketing Sham?
You should, of course, apologize for calling me elite. Cuz that's just silly. Elitist-without-the-elite? Probably? Prick? Well, yeah. Here's my point: respect the distance. All marathoners know what it means, and all marathoners at one time or another have paid the price for not heeding that advice. And this original post annoyed me because it smacked of disrespect. Somebody who's never actually run a marathon goes out and runs an easy training run and then posts something that more or less calls into question the basic physiology of glycogen depletion. It sounded like - hey, marathons are easy! I was grumpy. So sue me. Marcus G got the main point I was trying to make: if you run slow enough - compared to YOUR ability - you won't hit the wall. Or you won't hit it until much later. Duh. As he said, that's ultramarathoning. And I can't believe Trent hasn't already posted his epic book on the subject. (He'd also have some interesting stuff to say on what its like to run a marathon, even slow, without the right hydration and nutrition, since he's had to do it when marathons fall on the Jewish Sabbath). While I was intentionally being a grumpy prick in calling Backstretch's run "really slow," the truth is that it really was slow - for him. If his 10k PR is accurate, he ought to be able to get close to a 3:40 marathon. And based on his mileage and consistency, I'll bet he can. (Or could ... if he respects the distance). That was my point - not that it was a slow pace by some objective standard. He went on a training run a full minute plus slower than his MP. And then wonders if the scientists got it all wrong and its all silly marketing. To which I giggled and then frowned grumpily.
2013
3000 miles
Sub 19:00 for 5K 05-03-13 Clee Prom 5K - 19:00:66 that was bloody close!
Sub-40:00 for 10K 17-03-13 Gainsborough 10K - 39:43
Sub 88:00 for HM
Think Whirled Peas
Just because running is simple does not mean it is easy.
Relentless. Forward. Motion. <repeat>
Good think you've got this whole marathon deal figure out on your first try. You should write a book and share your expertise with the world. My suggestion for your first chapter: "Obvious Stuff 101: If You Run Really, Really Slow, You Won' t Find The Wall." Send me royalties if you use that, mmm-kay?
OK - Here is my (light hearted) take - MAIL MAN SURVIVES IN DRIVE-BY SHOOTING A local mailman, Mr B. Stretch, had a lucky escape earlier today when he was saved from serious injury by a passer by. An eyewitness Mr I.B. Kiddin gave us this exclusive account -
E-mail: eric.fuller.mail@gmail.com -----------------------------
Champions are made when no one is watching
"If you have the fire, run..." -John Climacus
I'm starting to see the benefits of going slow. Do you use the standard 180-age formula? Do you use other metrics?
Fine. Here goes. Fuel for the Run, Fuel for the Race Energy Sources ....... Glycogen is the primary energy source used for fight or flight type activities, which means it is the primary energy source used when running hard. When you run above 80-90% of your maximum effort, your body is burning almost entirely glycogen to fuel the effort. Below that, your body starts using the second energy source, which is fat....... ...........Well, even if you carb load absolutely perfectly (and most of us do not), when you finish loading, you then go to bed and sleep. When you wake up marathon morning, your body has used up as much as 25-30% of your glycogen just keeping you alive overnight. .
"The drops of rain make a hole in the stone, not by violence, but by oft falling." - Lucretius
Jake- I obviously would be just elated if your time predictions for myself were correct, but there is no way. Sub 4hrs is do-able though. I'll have all next year to shave off another 15 minutes. I really wasn't offended either. I took your comments, as I would when guys are just sitting around ribbing each other. Obviously the great majority of people around here know more about running than I, but I still think very few people are capable of burning up ALL their glycogen. I guess in my mind it is something like, yes you can burn 1 lb of fat running 26.2 miles. Problem is can you run 26.2 miles. Yes it is possible to burn all your Glycogen but you have to have the ability to run at 90% of your MAX speed for 20 miles..........which is another different thing in my opinion. It would be interesting if there was a stat on what pecentage of long distance runners have actually bonked.
Better yet, run two real marathons as hard as you can. One with gels and Gatorade and a decent breakfast, one without. Compare what happens.
Better yet, run two real marathons as hard as you can. One with gels and Gatorade and a decent breakfast, one without. Compare what happens. An experiment of one. Let us know the results.