Forums >General Running>Power Running Physiology Enters the Mainstream
I already posted one article where Dick said data supported his claims, yet conveniently left out that the authors who generated that data wholeheartedly disagreed with him. With that in mind, let's look at another excerpt from Brad Hudson's new book that Dick claims supports his theories and "brings them into the mainstream": "Oxygen is a big part of the sport of running. One of the signature physiological characteristics of the best distance runners is a large aerobic capacity, or the ability to consume oxygen at a very high rate while sustaining fast running speeds. And one of the primary effects of training as a distance runner is a significant increase in the ability to consume oxygen when running hard. Why is aerobic capacity so important to running performance? Because oxygen plays a direct role in releasing energy in the muscles. The more oxygen your muscles are able to consume as you run, the more energy they can pour into moving your body forward and the faster you can run over any distance exceeding a few hundred meters. The muscles are also able to release energy without oxygen, or anaerobically. And, in fact, anaerobic metabolism is well suited to provide large amounts of energy that are needed to fuel very high-intensity efforts, such as short sprints. However, anaerobic metabolism is much more wasteful than aerobic metabolism. The aerobic breakdown of a single glucose molecule yields 20 times as much energy as the anaerobic breakdown of the same glucose molecule. In addition, the aerobic system can metabolize fat, the body’s most abundant energy source, whereas the anaerobic system cannot. Aerobic metabolism is therefore better suited to sustaining submaximal efforts. Working muscles always release energy both aerobically and anaerobically, but the lower the intensity of exercise, the more they rely on aerobic metabolism, and the higher the intensity of exercise, the more they rely on anaerobic metabolism." Funny, Dick, how someone who you claim supports your gibberish begins his book by reiterating everything your detractors here and elsewhere repeat ad nauseum. If he is supporting you, you support this quoted above.
Self anointed title
Rich's theory seems to be from Run Faster (muscle part) and program from FIRST (low mileage without VO2, LT or aerobic crosstraining).
Rich, are you serious. I think you are sincere.
In summary: If you're aerobic system sucks you can't run worth anything even if you have the worlds strongest muscles. - CarmelRunner
Research shows that only a small % of people actually reach VO2max during a VO2max test. Their muscles fatigue prior to reaching VO2max - in other words it's not their aerobic system that is holding them back.
Troll responding to troll. Life just doesn't get much more dull.
E-mail: eric.fuller.mail@gmail.com -----------------------------
Feeling the growl again
"If you want to be a bad a$s, then do what a bad a$s does. There's your pep talk for today. Go Run." -- Slo_Hand
I am spaniel - Crusher of Treadmills
Not relevant to the topic
"Good-looking people have no spine. Their art never lasts. They get the girls, but we're smarter." - Lester Bangs
Can you please cite research that you use? Thanks.
Again, you quote muscle fiber fatigue as a REASON, but you still recommend 1/3 to 1/2 of your workouts (and the MAJORITY of your total weekly mileage) be easy runs. Despite stating that easy runs do not add significantly to performance.
Yawn. I'm done.
(Rich) These 3 things - muscle, physiological systems, Central Governor - together determine how you will perform during any endurance event.
Their muscles fatigue prior to reaching VO2max - in other words it's not their aerobic system that is holding them back.
Do you really not comprehend the difference between an easy run and a longer run at an easy pace? The following will help you understand. Tonight, go for a standard easy run - i.e. 3-4 miles at an easy pace. Then, this weekend go out for a 20 mile run at that same easy pace. Compare the difference between the 2 and let us know what you discovered.
Assuming the first part is true. It doesn't rule out the aerobic system. You have good ideas but you leave out the aerobic system.