Pages: 1 |
| Quality - one to ten (Read 694 times) |
|
posted: 1/16/2008 at 2:44 AM |
| I realize this is probably a stupid question but I'm not sure how to measure the "quality" of the run. Can someone explain? As the effort goes up so does the quality? Is tempo runs higher quality than hills? Please explain. |
mdmccat
|
|
|
| view log Just Believe |
posted: 1/16/2008 at 3:01 AM |
| uhh...1 sucked...10, a PR. |
Ricky
2008 Goals: sub-5 mile | sub-18 5k | sub-38 10k | sub-60 15k | sub-85 Half-M
Only those who risk going too far can possibly find out how far one can go. T.S. Eliot |
|
|
| view log |
posted: 1/16/2008 at 3:39 AM |
Weighing 265 lbs.= 1
Father of Two = 10 |
| "The long run is what puts the tiger in the cat" - Bill Squires
|
|
|
| view log Swamp Despot |
posted: 1/16/2008 at 4:11 AM |
You mean those ratings in the training log? I am baffled by those also.  |
| You're the bestest out of all the minions. ~ Scout7 |
|
|
|
posted: 1/16/2008 at 4:41 AM |
| Quote from Len on 1/16/2008 at 3:39 AM: Weighing 265 lbs.= 1
LOL ouch... (heh, I'm working on it!)
|
mdmccat
|
|
|
|
| view log Dave |
posted: 1/16/2008 at 1:05 PM |
I use quality as a measure of how well I stuck to the intent of the run. Effort is an absolute measure of how hard I went. Easy runs are usually a 2-4 on the effort scale. Hard runs towards 8-9. Races are usually 10.
For quality:
Easy Run - Run it Easy under my HR ceiling = 10
Easy Run - Ignore the HRM and do speedwoork = 1
Hard Run - Really rock the hard effort intervals = 10
Hard Run - Stop halfway for beers = 1
Maybe I should rethink the last one. |
Pursuing the Pace Bunny, 1 Mile at a time
dgb2n@yahoo.com
|
|
|
| view log |
posted: 1/16/2008 at 1:26 PM |
I think it is meant to be subjective and open to interpretation.
I rate it based on how I felt on a given run... if I had no energy and couldn't wait for it to be over I'll rate it low. If I felt great at the end I'll rate it higher. |
-------------------------------------
Upcoming Races:
Johnny Kelly Half Marathon - May 25 - 1:44:02
Will Speck Memorial 5K - June 11 - 21:36
Blessing of the Fleet 10 Miler - July 25 - 1:15:11
Reach the Beach Relay - September 12-13
Chicago Marathon - October 12
Kickball Record: 4-3 Season is over :(
------------------------------------- |
|
|
Mr Inertia view logHeck of a Guy |
posted: 1/16/2008 at 1:31 PM |
I base it on a subjective how I feel scale. If I feel ucky, but still got the workout in, that's high quality.
Others base quality on perceived effort. 12 miles steady followed by 4-6 at tempo is a high quality workout for example. |
|
|
|
posted: 1/16/2008 at 8:10 PM |
MD
Typically most of your runs are easy conversational pace. When you add "quality" or a "work out" it means race pace work, tempo work, interval work, Farleks, fast finish long run. This is what quality means in running terms. Generally, most runners will do two quality work outs per week.
I do one in mid week (slow tempo longer, faster tempo shorter, CV reps, race pace stuff etc.) and I add some faster running to my long run for my second quality session to make it a work out. |
| Those who try, fail! Those who do what it takes to succeed, succeed!! |
|
|
| view log blood for coffee |
posted: 1/16/2008 at 8:27 PM |
| NateFromRI nailed it. It's totally subjective & up to you how to rate your own runs. The majority of my runs are Easy runs so, I usually rate the effort between 5-7. Quality depends how I felt during the run. No aches & pains or a longish run without bonking gets a higher rating. |
| Rust Never Sleeps |
|
|
| view log |
posted: 1/16/2008 at 8:37 PM |
| DGB2N nailed it. That's exactly how I use the Quality scale. |
2008 Goals:
2000 miles for the year
100 mile week
Sub 3:10 marathon
Sub 19min 5K |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 |
