Forums >Running 101>What constitutes a run during a running streak?
No pun intended.
"Good-looking people have no spine. Their art never lasts. They get the girls, but we're smarter." - Lester Bangs
Why 4? or 3? Just curious...
If this is just a tally of opinion then Im with Schneidr. 3 miles.
If your goal is to get a fitness or training benefit, then you need a good 20 minutes. If your goal is to keep a running streak alive, it may require less.
E-mail: eric.fuller.mail@gmail.com -----------------------------
Wall of Text
Have you ever thought of employing an editor?
Damn Yankee
Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending. Carl Bard
GreyBeard
And the reasoning for the opinion is simple, and - I think - pretty undeniable: 3 miles is about the minimum distance for a run to do you any good. Assuming the 'experts' are right, you've got to hit that 20 minute mark for cardio benefit. For most folks, 3 miles will get you to 20-30 minutes. Even for most faster people, a 3 (or 4) mile run can be a quick but useful tempo run. 3 miles is also - again, my opinion - about the minimum for a run to have much meaning, unless you're running really, really slowly. Unless its an under-3 mile race, I'd never step out the door for that distance.
2020
Agreed If you look at that website some guy has a 40 yr streak. Would be curious to see his log / minimum.
Barfing from chemo.
jules2
Old age is when you move from illegal to prescribed drugs.
Yup. This thread asks for opinions. My opinion is three miles. At least. What some organization says is irrelevant to my opinion.
Oh Mighty Wing