Running a Sub 4 Minute Mile: Help and Advice Needed (Read 281 times)

wcrunner2


Are we there, yet?

    Did anyone else pick up on him saying he planned to walk 25 miles per day? I have nothing constructive to say other than this stood out to me.

     

     

    Noticed that but chose to not address it directly, rather encouraged him to begin a running program.

     2024 Races:

          03/09 - Livingston Oval Ultra 6-Hour, 22.88 miles

          05/11 - D3 50K
          05/25 - What the Duck 12-Hour

          06/17 - 6 Days in the Dome 12-Hour.

     

     

         

      Set a goal to consistently run, jump into a race every now and then and gradually increase your mileage.  10% per week which is often advised is too much in my opinion for a new runner.  Every 4th week drop your mileage down to an earlier cycle for rest.

       

      Your rest is the most important thing, followed by diet, etc.  You will not adapt if you don't take care of yourself.

       

      Some tough love:

       

      Saying you want to run a sub 4 minute mile is like saying that you want to be a space pilot without having any flight training in an airplane.  Learn how to fly first.

       

      You have to get this thought out of your mind for now or you will not last.  As things click along make goals that are within reach.  You will know if it is possible after a year.

       

      I am working with someone now that has an outside shot at it but we are thinking on a 5 year plan.  For him it's possible but he needs some luck to pull it off.  Sickness, injuries, life happens stuff all can get in the way.  He has run a 53 sec. 400 at the end of a workout and we are not there yet.

       

      Sub 4 minute milers don't train 8 hours per day and/or go for long walks.  They do however value their rest more than other athletes.  Keep that in mind.  You can't muscle your way to your best performance no matter where that is.

         

        That's still a major challenge.  I started running post HS at 21.  It took me two months to run sub-5:00. After 4 months I had built up to 50 mpw and had to back off for several months because it was too much, too quickly.  Granted I don't have great genetics, but it was two plus years before I could consistently run 70 mile weeks.

         

        I've never run 70 mile weeks consistently. I can't recall ever running more than two in a row, and typically only about 10 at most in a year. Of course, I was a middle distance guy, and we were probably only doing 30-40mpw at UO then. Brad Hudson ran a LOT, and got in trouble with coach for sneaking in extra miles, but he was probably RIGHT. If I knew then what I know now, I would have been significantly faster. And I would have bought all the Apple stock I could afford 😁

         

        But really, Riman643's goal is a noble one, and it's not impossible. Giving him advices and encouragement to reach the stages of development along the way is our duty as forum members. Unless someone instructs him to emulate how an ostrich runs...or he suggests it. Then we know we've been had!

        60-64 age group  -  University of Oregon alumni  -  Irreverent and Annoying

        Running Problem


        Problem Child

          Hi all! So I have scratched my plan on having an exact date to hit 70 mpw. Instead I am just going to take it in segments and reassess every 4 - 5 weeks. My first segment will be running 15 mpw and I'm going to try and do it over 5 weeks. Ideally, by the 5th week I'll run 5 5km runs under 30 minutes. Does that sound reasonable to start. I have created a plan using the tool on this website so feel free to look at it and give me some insight or advice to improve it. Thanks!

           

          This sounds reasonable. I was your size once and decided to start running. Don’t run too hard. Running East should feel easy and right now every run will feel hard because it is. Easy running is just whatever pace you feel like running and if you need to walk then walk. Running for time can be just as challenging as running for distance. The most important thing is not to overwhelming yourself or your body to the point of injury. Being sore is one thing. Being injured is another. A 30 minute 5k sounds like a good goal. I built up to a 5k distance and my long runs were 5-6 miles and those probably took me an hour when I started.

           

           

          as for increasing mileage. Just remember a month ago when you didn’t run. If someone said to increase your mileage you could tell them ‘10 percent of zero is zero’ and be correct. You have a pace for a 400m so you could look up what a training pace would be for a 20 minute run using that if you wanted, or multiply by 4 and call it a mile and use THAT pace if you wanted.

          Many of us aren't sure what the hell point you are trying to make and no matter how we guess, it always seems to be something else. Which usually means a person is doing it on purpose.

          VDOT 53.37 

          5k18:xx | Marathon 2:55:22

          mikeymike


             

            Not trolling, just got a bit overzealous in what I originally thought I was going to do. If you look at my training plan I believe I made it much more manageable.

             

            Ok then if you're serious I would recommend reading up on what runners do. The best people in our sport--professionals who have years of training and competing in high school and college running behind them--don't spend more than 2 hours a day running, usually running twice a day. They may spend another hour on the things that support running, like weights, core, flexibility, massage. They sleep a lot and eat right.

             

            Look up Matthew Centrowitz or Jenny Simpson and how they train.

             

            Get a book or two on the basics of training, like Danels' Running Formula.

             

            Your original plan called for 8 hours per day of training. How does that work for a 24-year-old? Do you not work? Do you have a trust fund?

            Runners run

              this is a question I don't know.

               

              what does you 200 or 400 time need to be to be able to run a 4 minute mile.

               

              I was always slow i don't think i ever ran under 60 for a 400.

              mikeymike


                this is a question I don't know.

                 

                what does you 200 or 400 time need to be to be able to run a 4 minute mile.

                 

                I was always slow i don't think i ever ran under 60 for a 400.

                 

                My guess would be you'd need to have 50 second 400m speed, minimum. I'm sure there are exceptions and someone may chime in with examples of runners who ran sub-4 without ever running a 50 second quarter, but I suspect those are people who just never put any focus on the 400 and deep down they had at least 50 second 400 speed. The 200 is less relevant.

                Runners run

                  this is a question I don't know.

                   

                  what does you 200 or 400 time need to be to be able to run a 4 minute mile.

                   

                  I was always slow i don't think i ever ran under 60 for a 400.

                   

                  It depends on which direction you're approaching a 4:00. Some people have better endurance, and their 400 PR is only :58, but they can run four :60 in a row. Other people are speed demons with a 400m PR several seconds below :50, so running a :60 for them is nearly jogging. But being fast isn't a foolproof recipe for a good mile, nor does being a great long distance runner.

                   

                  One does not necessarily exclude the other, Kipchoge is a sub 4:00 miler and has the world record in the marathon.

                   

                  But from the hip, I'd say anyone capable of a 4:00 mile should be able to run at least a :55 400m.

                  200m? That's a sprint. There are many elite 200m runners who can't even break 2:00 for 800m.

                  60-64 age group  -  University of Oregon alumni  -  Irreverent and Annoying

                     

                    It depends on which direction you're approaching a 4:00. Some people have better endurance, and their 400 PR is only :58, but they can run four :60 in a row. Other people are speed demons with a 400m PR several seconds below :50, so running a :60 for them is nearly jogging. But being fast isn't a foolproof recipe for a good mile, nor does being a great long distance runner.

                     

                    One does not necessarily exclude the other, Kipchoge is a sub 4:00 miler and has the world record in the marathon.

                     

                    But from the hip, I'd say anyone capable of a 4:00 mile should be able to run at least a :55 400m.

                    200m? That's a sprint. There are many elite 200m runners who can't even break 2:00 for 800m.

                     

                    This is accurate and you have to train these athletes differently.

                    AndyTN


                    Overweight per CDC BMI

                       Your original plan called for 8 hours per day of training. How does that work for a 24-year-old? Do you not work? Do you have a trust fund?

                      I asked myself these same questions all the time when I browse the training logs of some people on RA who are averaging 70+ miles per week. I have two kids under five and a busy job with travel so I am usually looking for someone to give me a big trophy when I get 30+ miles in a single week.

                      Memphis / 38 male

                      5k - 20:39 / 10k - 43:48 / Half - 1:34:47 / Full - 3:38:10

                        The original post talks about devoting 8h per day to training. Maybe your expectations have already become a bit more pragmatic by this point. Either way, whether it's going to be 8h or just 2-4h (which would still be very impressive in my view!) per day that you want to devote to becoming a faster runner, I recommend that you allocate a large portion of that time to learning and planning. Especially in the early stages. If you train inefficiently, putting in more hours won't be valuable, and may even turn out to harm your fitness (injury risk). While it may not seem like directly making progress, my recommendation is take 1h every day, for at least a week or two, to get a better sense of all the running advice that's out there. Asking people on this forum is a great start, but I'd say it's not enough given how ambitious your goals are. The more you plan to train, the more progress is lost by training counterproductively.

                        It's important not to be too attached to a certain vision of training. My motivation works in a similar way: I tend to make ambitious plans and when I encounter reasons why things probably take more time or turn out to be more complex, I'm reluctant to make adjustments. But it's unwise to throw all one's energy into something only to realize later that some very foreseeable mistakes ruined most of the progress.

                         

                        Here some quick advice (I'd recommend more research on all of these): 
                        - Building up a foundation of high weekly miles seems like a decent first step. It makes sense to focus on developing good running form early on. I don't think speedwork is important at the start, but it might make sense to already incorporate a few strides here and there once you're comfortable running 45mins+ several times per week. 
                        - Don't increase weekly miles too quickly. Everyone is saying that because people usually don't listen. But you're basically guaranteed to injure yourself if you neglect this advice. Just keep in mind that the time and motivation you lose from an injury weighs much more heavily than the benefits you might get from squeezing in an additional practice session despite early warning signs of doing too much too soon. If you're new to running, you might relatively quickly reach a point where your endurance becomes good enough that you feel like you can do a 1h run almost every day. But the important thing to realize is that endurance and motivation to go running aren't the limiting factor. Your progress will be bottlenecked by your bone density and the strength of your muscles, tendons, ligaments and so on. If you go running even though your body hasn't made enough running adaptations, it's just a matter of time until you injure muscles, ligaments, tendons or bones. You can't rush these things, unfortunately. If you really want to train more, maybe use the elliptical trainer at the gym on some of the days (low risk of overuse injuries), or do some other kind of cross-training (swimming or cycling, for instance). 
                        - Take time regularly to train stabilizing muscles for injury prevention and for improving your running efficiency. Maybe also take up stretching (though I'm less certain about the evidence base for that). This way, you should be able to increase your weekly miles more easily (without injuries) further down the line.

                          The original post talks about devoting 8h per day to training. Maybe your expectations have already become a bit more pragmatic by this point. Either way, whether it's going to be 8h or just 2-4h (which would still be very impressive in my view!) per day that you want to devote to becoming a faster runner, I recommend that you allocate a large portion of that time to learning and planning. Especially in the early stages. If you train inefficiently, putting in more hours won't be valuable, and may even turn out to harm your fitness (injury risk). While it may not seem like directly making progress, my recommendation is take 1h every day, for at least a week or two, to get a better sense of all the running advice that's out there. Asking people on this forum is a great start, but I'd say it's not enough given how ambitious your goals are. The more you plan to train, the more progress is lost by training counterproductively.

                          It's important not to be too attached to a certain vision of training. My motivation works in a similar way: I tend to make ambitious plans and when I encounter reasons why things probably take more time or turn out to be more complex, I'm reluctant to make adjustments. But it's unwise to throw all one's energy into something only to realize later that some very foreseeable mistakes ruined most of the progress.

                           

                          Here some quick advice (I'd recommend more research on all of these): 
                          - Building up a foundation of high weekly miles seems like a decent first step. It makes sense to focus on developing good running form early on. I don't think speedwork is important at the start, but it might make sense to already incorporate a few strides here and there once you're comfortable running 45mins+ several times per week. 
                          - Don't increase weekly miles too quickly. Everyone is saying that because people usually don't listen. But you're basically guaranteed to injure yourself if you neglect this advice. Just keep in mind that the time and motivation you lose from an injury weighs much more heavily than the benefits you might get from squeezing in an additional practice session despite early warning signs of doing too much too soon. If you're new to running, you might relatively quickly reach a point where your endurance becomes good enough that you feel like you can do a 1h run almost every day. But the important thing to realize is that endurance and motivation to go running aren't the limiting factor. Your progress will be bottlenecked by your bone density and the strength of your muscles, tendons, ligaments and so on. If you go running even though your body hasn't made enough running adaptations, it's just a matter of time until you injure muscles, ligaments, tendons or bones. You can't rush these things, unfortunately. If you really want to train more, maybe use the elliptical trainer at the gym on some of the days (low risk of overuse injuries), or do some other kind of cross-training (swimming or cycling, for instance). 
                          - Take time regularly to train stabilizing muscles for injury prevention and for improving your running efficiency. Maybe also take up stretching (though I'm less certain about the evidence base for that). This way, you should be able to increase your weekly miles more easily (without injuries) further down the line.
                          - Especially when you run more than three times per week, 80% of your training volume should be done at an easy intensity. Easy means a pace where you could hold a conversation while running. Some people recommend "training less, but higher intensity." That's a good way to train if one doesn't have all day every day to go running. But if you want to devote most of your attention and time to running, then you have to get used to easy-pace workouts. Smile

                          mikeymike


                            I asked myself these same questions all the time when I browse the training logs of some people on RA who are averaging 70+ miles per week. I have two kids under five and a busy job with travel so I am usually looking for someone to give me a big trophy when I get 30+ miles in a single week.

                             

                            I ask myself this question when I browse my own training log from like 2007-2013. My youngest of 4 kids was born in 2006 so was a toddler for most of those high mileage years and I had a high stress job then too. I was almost exclusively a pre-dawn runner then.

                             

                            I did travel less during those years though--that makes a huge difference. From mid-2014 through 2019 I probably hit peak business travel for my career and it killed my running. I started having relentless injuries after being bullet proof for most of my running life and I swear it was mostly due to travel--sitting on airplanes is the worst thing for a runner's body. Throw in the poor sleep and bad eating that and it's a recipe for disaster.

                             

                            Trying to get back in a groove now but I'm older, fatter and my body has a lot more mileage on it.

                            Runners run

                            darkwave


                            Mother of Cats

                               

                              I did travel less during those years though--that makes a huge difference. From mid-2014 through 2019 I probably hit peak business travel for my career and it killed my running. I started having relentless injuries after being bullet proof for most of my running life and I swear it was mostly due to travel--sitting on airplanes is the worst thing for a runner's body. Throw in the poor sleep and bad eating that and it's a recipe for disaster.

                               

                              Trying to get back in a groove now but I'm older, fatter and my body has a lot more mileage on it.

                               

                              Business travel is HORRIBLE for running.  All the sleep deprivation, sitting, and mandatory late night business dinners.

                               

                              I have negotiated a limit of 2 business trips a year for work (and domestic only) - I see that as part of my compensation package.   I've also passed up promotions for the same reason - the next step up in my career would be one where I would need to travel a lot, including internationally, sometimes on short notice.  No thanks.

                              Everyone's gotta running blog; I'm the only one with a POOL-RUNNING blog.

                               

                              And...if you want a running Instagram where all the pictures are of cats, I've got you covered.


                              From the Internet.

                                I asked myself these same questions all the time when I browse the training logs of some people on RA who are averaging 70+ miles per week. I have two kids under five and a busy job with travel so I am usually looking for someone to give me a big trophy when I get 30+ miles in a single week.

                                 

                                This is honestly half the reason I'm in no hurry to go back to full-time work until my daughter is a bit older. I got super burned out in grad school, was able to hit 70+ for marathon peak while teaching full-time for one cycle, but doing it consistently would have been a nightmare. And doing it for mile training would be nigh unto impossible at my training paces - I'm already barely holding it together trying to manage ~50ish without injury this season, lol.