Any women on here run in the vaporfly? I thought about jumping on the bandwagon for a racing shoe, but it being technically all men’s sizing makes me nervous
Me, Lauren, Bluerun, Damaris and ROS have tried them (I think that is everyone?)
For reference, I wear a women's size 9 and got the VF in a 7.5
Former Bad Ass
I have the 4%, the Next% and the Pink% (that's how I call it). I wear the Men's 8 which is the 9.5 for women's.
Damaris
yep, I wear a Women's 11, and got a 9.5 in the Vaporflys. I tried the Next 4%, but given that 1) I am not really racing anymore, and 2) the fit was off, I decided to send them back.
I did notice a huge difference when I started racing in the Vaporflies, but then my training went to shit and the last 2 races I ran in them, I didn't notice a difference. I'm not sure if that's because of my iron levels being so low, or I'd lost a bunch of fitness, or whatever. Probably a combination of many different things.
If I ever decide to start training again, I'd like to compare the NB 1400s (which I love) and the Vaporflies.
Freesoul, an overly simplistic way to think about the shoes is run a mile in work boots. Then run one in your normal running shoes.
I'm not convinced they are faster than the Adios. My thought is they might save your legs from taking such a pounding since they are so much more cushioned (yet super light - lighter than the Adios)
yep, I wear a Women's 11, and got a 9.5 in the Vaporflys. I tried the Next 4%, but given that 1) I am not really racing anymore, and 2) the fit was off, I decided to send them back. I did notice a huge difference when I started racing in the Vaporflies, but then my training went to shit and the last 2 races I ran in them, I didn't notice a difference. I'm not sure if that's because of my iron levels being so low, or I'd lost a bunch of fitness, or whatever. Probably a combination of many different things. If I ever decide to start training again, I'd like to compare the NB 1400s (which I love) and the Vaporflies.
I think you and I spoke about our legs feeling the same way while running in them. I think it was our nutrient deficiency. Worth trying them out again.
Runs4Sanity
You thinking that there isn't a huge amount of difference in racing in the Ravenna vs the Next% doesn't mean there isn't a huge difference. There is a huge difference.
Unfortunately I could never find out, my pronation thingy wouldn't allow me to I'd be having all sorts of issues... or so the LRS has lead me to believe, along with the few stupid decisions I've made trying other shoes and immediately getting shin issues.
I am reading the Outsideonline article by Sweat Science, apparently the 5 fastest record-eligible marathons in history have all been run in the last 13 months - and they've all been run in versions of Nike's Vaporfly.
It goes on to say that "There's no longer any room for doubt about the massive effects of shoes with carbon fiber plates". Still sounds like rocket science to me, lol.
Now I'm freaking jealous.
*Do It For Yourself, Do It Because They Said It Was Impossible, Do It Because They Said You Were Incapable*
PRs
5k - 24:15 (7:49 min/mile pace)
10k - 51:47 (8:16 min/mile pace)
15k -1:18:09 (8:24 min/mile pace)
13.1 - 1:53:12 (8:39 min/mile pace)
26:2 - 4:14:55 (9:44 min/mile)
Okay, yeah work boots... lol hell I've ran around in regular hiking boots and notice the difference.
Did you see Ryan Hall's post?
Interesting. I did see that the IAAF is planning on investigating the shoe
LOL, “athletes of all brands”.
Dave
Sara Hall is sponsored by Asics so can't wear the Nikes
Go figure
He makes such a well considered point, but then he uses "irregardless."
Trying to find some more hay to restock the barn
delicate flower
Ryan Hall would have happily worn those shoes if he still ran and was a Nike athlete.
<3
^ This.